You have a limited view of Apprenticeships I'm afraid.
What? Teaching you procedural knowledge for the vocation you are in as apposed to declarative knowledge?
You have a limited view of Apprenticeships I'm afraid.
Which is why it is never the only measure. Like all things it is an indication.
The same way, a degree doesn't prove competence either.
Both.
But her academic qualification were by her own admission a waste of time and simply slowed her down, she said she should have gone into practice after A levels rather than University.
To the people here saying degree's are overrated, Can you explain how someone would get into Law or Any other traditional subject for that matter?
Quite but you appeared to be suggesting that experience proved competence. I'm not convinced that even competency tests prove competency - at least not an ability to do something competently for a longer period of time, I might be able to fluke a competency test for say marketing but I probably couldn't do the job (nor would I want to but that's another issue entirely).
I hope your wife feels she got something useful out of them, I'm not pursuing a career in my degree subject but I would have been sorry not to have gone at all. Then again I'm one of those people who doesn't believe degrees have to be vocationally useful to be worthwhile.
It's not so much that you can get into a career in law or medicine without a degree but for law at least (and probably medicine to an extent) what you learn could probably be learnt through an apprenticeship/pupilliage or similar. So while a degree may currently be vital because of the entrance requirements it's not a necessity in terms of learning the skills if you see the difference.
Quite but you appeared to be suggesting that experience proved competence. I'm not convinced that even competency tests prove competency - at least not an ability to do something competently for a longer period of time, I might be able to fluke a competency test for say marketing but I probably couldn't do the job (nor would I want to but that's another issue entirely).
I hope your wife feels she got something useful out of them, I'm not pursuing a career in my degree subject but I would have been sorry not to have gone at all. Then again I'm one of those people who doesn't believe degrees have to be vocationally useful to be worthwhile.
It's not so much that you can get into a career in law or medicine without a degree but for law at least (and probably medicine to an extent) what you learn could probably be learnt through an apprenticeship/pupilliage or similar. So while a degree may currently be vital because of the entrance requirements it's not a necessity in terms of learning the skills if you see the difference.
What? Teaching you procedural knowledge for the vocation you are in as apposed to declarative knowledge?
but those people rarely get promotions from within and that will show.
*sigh*
That you think apprenticeships = skilled manual labour.
No, I think apprenticeships teach very specific skills for a vocation.
Engineering Apprenticeships
When interviewing recently for a new job I have had people take a lot more notice in my career progression in the three employers I worked at for approx 6 years each than anything else.
Promotion itself often shows recognition of value and ability a lot more than a piece of paper.
I hadn't noticed this before but its quite possible that it was never so much of an issue as I wasn't so far up the ladder previously.
The need for a degree depends entirely on the Job and even in things like Chartered Accountancy, Engineering and IT a degree may not be necessary if you have relevant experience or have an apprenticeship.
[TW]Fox;18744152 said:Do they lead to chartered status?
While not all of the Chartered Accountancy exams require a degree, without one will require just as long if you train with any of the Big Four. You need a Chartership if you want to be an auditor.
There's always management accounting!
*sigh*
That you think apprenticeships = skilled manual labour.
You do not need a degree to be eligible for CEng or IEng.
I did my Engineering Apprenticeship at the Michelin Tyre Company and it was regarded as being the best in the world.
Virtually every upper management boss came through the Apprenticeship route.
To get into a Michelin Apprenticeship they didn't care about your qualifications as long as you passed their tests.
I'm 99% sure this is also how Rolls Royce worked.
[TW]Fox;18744273 said:Correct.
It just takes a heck of a lot longer.
A guy I work with who is in his mid 40 (I'm in my late 20s) used to work for Marconi before it got renamed and merged and split etc. He's described how they used to work and it used to be like that but its changed a lot now (it has been 20 years after all) and forms part of BAe. In his section there'd be one guy with a degree hired each year and half a dozen without one. The guy with the degree would be paid more initially but the others would receive larger pay increases to catch up. It relied on a certain kind of turn over of personnel, which no longer was the case in the mid 90s and the whole system had to be restructured, the merger into BAe not withstanding!I did my Engineering Apprenticeship at the Michelin Tyre Company and it was regarded as being the best in the world.
Virtually every upper management boss came through the Apprenticeship route.
To get into a Michelin Apprenticeship they didn't care about your qualifications as long as you passed their tests.
I'm 99% sure this is also how Rolls Royce worked.
A guy I work with who is in his mid 40 (I'm in my late 20s) used to work for Marconi before it got renamed and merged and split etc. He's described how they used to work and it used to be like that but its changed a lot now (it has been 20 years after all) and forms part of BAe. In his section there'd be one guy with a degree hired each year and half a dozen without one. The guy with the degree would be paid more initially but the others would receive larger pay increases to catch up. It relied on a certain kind of turn over of personnel, which no longer was the case in the mid 90s and the whole system had to be restructured, the merger into BAe not withstanding!
On a slightly unrelated note I've never heard 'plateglass university' before. I've heard of the Russell group and Oxbridge (since I don't live under a rock!) but what makes a university 'plateglass'?
My wife is chartered and said that given the exceptions her degree gave her, it would have been far quicker to enter practice at the A level stage rather than the graduate stage. Mainly down to gaining the experience required to get signed off.