The 'peaceful protestors' are just as foolish.
Oh come on, that's just silly.
If people want to protest they should protest. Just because someone doesn't think like you doesn't mean they shouldn't protest if they deem it appropriate.
The 'peaceful protestors' are just as foolish.
Who's to say either way it wouldn't have, crystal ball?
Im just sick to death of this carnage in the name of whatever flavour of the month protest happens to be going on, do you think locking these silly ***** up till monday morning then giving them a 100 quid fine for a public order offence is deterring them?
If only we could make them pay back the real cost of the damage and expense they incurI think we should. Currently they know they can wreak havoc and someone else will pick up the bill.
Yeah. The insurers
Not that I'm saying such behaviour is acceptable, of course.
Yeah. The insurers
Not that I'm saying such behaviour is acceptable, of course.
And who in the long run do you think picks up the bill for the insurance?
And who in the long run do you think picks up the bill for the insurance?
Yep, for 'the insurers' read ordinary people who pay insurance premiums, which is pretty much every adult.
What was with that group of like 7-8 people inside a circle of Police officers on BBC just now...![]()
[TW]Fox;18761546 said:So you are saying its probably just a co-incidence?
Unlikely - damage caused by Civil Disturbance is generally excluded.
Oh be quiet, you really do speak absolute tosh.
Not what the very cold looking blonde lady said an hour ago![]()
Pretty sure they have just said close to a quarter of a million, which last time I checked was half of that.
The again, given what you're protesting about, figures that you would have trouble with actual numbers and facts.