taliban let them stay in afghanistan... they shared the same training grounds and stuff...
al qaeda probably have loads of money from drugs you know afghanistan was full of poppy fields?
Osama bin Laden is dead - no graphic/violent images.
- Thread starter dante6491
- Start date
taliban let them stay in afghanistan... they shared the same training grounds and stuff...
al qaeda probably have loads of money from drugs you know afghanistan was full of poppy fields?
Pakistan don't seem bothered about it. Why should we?
That's no big deal because no one cares and in this case the action justifies the means.
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 5,769
God just told me "the man down in the sea isn't bin laden"
I would be amazed if they are not bothered, but what can they do now?
A very dangerous precedent there I think. Who is Obama to decide when to breach a sovereign nations territory. Are we really saying self interest trumps all now?
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 5,769
I am not surprise if Pakistan will vow a war on terror against USA next after stupid and coward of PM David Cameron give Pakistan £650 million pounds!
USA is a smell of fishy going on as a cover up!
USA is a smell of fishy going on as a cover up!
Last edited:
Crazy Man!
The footage of the bedroom where I think he was killed looked messy but there was no sign of a gun battle or shootout. I couldn't see any bullet holes in the wall just a big blood puddle.
In the case of hunting down the worlds most wanted terrorist self-interest is paramount for all of us including our "trustworthy" partner Pakistan.
No what we're saying is if you can't stop them with force there's **** all you can do really.
It's not exactly a precedent either since the first tribe of man stuck a spear in their neighbours to gain their hunting ground it's been the way of the world.
Not sure where your getting this idea that America has trespassed on sovereign soil. Several Pakaistani intelligence agents were with the team. If the assault wasn't at least unofficially sanctioned they wouldn't have been with them.
What people fail to understand is that governments like those in Pakistan can never be seen as openly allowing allied troops to operate on their soil. Behind the screens thou they allow the allies to preform operations as needed. Pakistan has no more love of fundementalists, Taliban, or Al-Queda than any other government. They want them gone, and need the americans help. However at the same time they are constrained by the will of anti-american sentiment that runs deep in many areas of their country. Pakistan will never offer official sanction for such activities as it will just stir the populace up.
So he wanted to die but still hid himself away for 10 years. Of course he didn't want to die. The americans shot him twice to make sure he was dead, they asked him to surrender and he didn't so they shot him. If they wanted to take him alive, they could have done.
jumping to conclusions i bit don't we think ?
The footage isn't exactly amazing quality, nor does it survey the entire office in sufficient detail to establish there are no bullet marks anywhere.
People are jumping to conclusions.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 47,223
I disagree. It could have caused more problems. For example hostage taking for his release. Easier just to kill him, kick him over the edge of a ship and be done with it. For once I think the US have handled it well.
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 5,769
The sun newspaper show image picture of massive huge hole blast through bin laden bedroom's wall is a laughable! Twice shot in his head or that big blast hole through his wall could have damaged all of his bedroom, it all cover up, a 100% cover up! If that big blast hole through his wall, why there isn't any brick of wall fallen into the floor, I seen nothing there!
Well gee if the Sun wrote it..must be true.
Did they say it was him in the bedroom that had the large pool of blood?...honestly asking havnt seen one person report that just the same bit of footage over and over.