not really, just an urban myth, the Tories bleed the economy dry and labour spend into oblivion.
Neither approach works.
If Maggie and Major had done such a great job, why did labour sweep to power with such a huge majority?
Is that based on manifesto or historic philosophy?
EDIT: Either way, that diagram kinda proves my point with regards to the Lib Dems being more Conservative than Labour, depending on which way you read it anyway...![]()
I've often said the SNP were at the centre of the political world![]()
Completely middle of the road![]()
Which in some ways is a little odd... I admit I do find some of the Green manifesto promises to my liking (and would seriously consider voting for them if they were in with a chance) yet I do tend to agree more generally with Conservative manifesto...![]()
What, like under AV?
But yeah, i've heard tons of people say that they would vote green if they either had a representative or had a chance of getting in.
The Economy was doing fine in 1997.
It is true that unemployment fell under Labour. It's also true the state sector grew enormously, but what good is that if it's all artificial growth funded for by debt? No responsible Government would run up such a deficit in the 'boom' times. Brown's Golden Rule was an absolute joke too.
What, like under AV?
But yeah, i've heard tons of people say that they would vote green if they either had a representative or had a chance of getting in.
Does make my chart even more confusing now I've actually read what it's are apparently based on...![]()