mothers have to go on job seekers allowence with children over 7

how is it a strange thread, chavs that just spunge from the government need to be weeded out,

You mean sponge? I really wouldn't normally say anything (as my posting history will illustrate), but when someone decides to launch a category-wide non-specific ad homien attack on the intelligence of a group of society, it often helps that the attacker can at least spell his rant correctly.

As has been asked of you a couple of times now; what makes you think that the 'unintelligent chavs' won't simply have another child, followed by another in say 5.5 years time? It's the genuine families who will suffer here, probably taking a cut in benefits while being forced to seek work that blatantly doesn't exist.

Firstly, I wouldn't be attacking other people's intelligence when you yourself are having grammer problems.

Secondly, it isn't pressure. How can you pressure someone into taking a job that isn't there?

Lastly, who has the low intelligence? The "scummy mums", or the Job centre advisor?

Anyone else you want to insult while your at it?

You missed that last one too. ;) Then again you weren't the one insulting the intelligence of someone else, you were rebuking them for it... so we'll have to let you off. :D
 
You missed that last one too. ;) Then again you weren't the one insulting the intelligence of someone else, you were rebuking them for it... so we'll have to let you off. :D

It's going to be even worse when he gets independence, the country won't be able to afford the schools...
Just saying that to wind him up :p
 
You mean sponge? I really wouldn't normally say anything (as my posting history will illustrate), but when someone decides to launch a category-wide non-specific ad homien attack on the intelligence of a group of society, it often helps that the attacker can at least spell his rant correctly.

As has been asked of you a couple of times now; what makes you think that the 'unintelligent chavs' won't simply have another child, followed by another in say 5.5 years time? It's the genuine families who will suffer here, probably taking a cut in benefits while being forced to seek work that blatantly doesn't exist, but i am not sure they would have any control over it them self's...



You missed that last one too. ;) Then again you weren't the one insulting the intelligence of someone else, you were rebuking them for it... so we'll have to let you off. :D

They probably will want another baby soon as there told they have to go to the job centre, unless they made a rule that says you can't have another child within X amount of years , that way they can't live in a easy loop hole.
 
They probably will want another baby soon as there told they have to go to the job centre, unless they made a rule that says you can't have another child within X amount of years , that way they can't live in a easy loop hole.

So you want every mother to stay out of work? How is the mum supposed to have a career if she has to take maternity every X years rather than having 2 or 3 kids in 3 or 4 years and then going back to work?
 
They probably will want another baby soon as there told they have to go to the job centre, unless they made a rule that says you can't have another child within X amount of years , that way they can't live in a easy loop hole.

Can you quantify the number of people that fall into this criteria?
 
They probably will want another baby soon as there told they have to go to the job centre, unless they made a rule that says you can't have another child within X amount of years , that way they can't live in a easy loop hole.

So on the one hand you say the thick chavs will now be forced to work in jobs that don't exist, and about time too... then you follow it up by admitting that at best it will force them to have more children (that they wouldn't have likely had without being forced into it by this new system) just to avoid being drafted in?

Remind me why you think this is a good idea again.

I've a nice cane here, it won't hurt much, bend over.

Get a room. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom