Glad he wasn't shot (though I'd make the case that it would be utterly no loss to the world anyway) but seriously, why didn't they use a tazor? While the tactics they used worked, I would have expected them to call someone in with a tazer and just make him go down to ground with it. Safer for the police and dare I say a bit of justice delivered haha.
Then again tazers aren't 100% success rate and could put him into a frenzy. So maybe that is why.
I don't understand, surely they should have tasered him? or Rubber Shot gun shells?
Read the last few posts about tasers.
Ok so if you shoot someone with rubber bullets, he doesn't go down, and instead sends him into a frenzy. What then?
Crazy!! 30 officers. If it was another country the situation would have been dealt within minutes. Too much red tape in the UK police force.
shoot him again? in the face?
Would have been shocking if we had gunned him down. UK police constitutionally unarmed 1 - nutjob army/police force idea 0
Crazy!! 30 officers. If it was another country the situation would have been dealt within minutes. Too much red tape in the UK police force.