An Independent Scotland?

Nitefly said:
I hope that whatever the majority want they get.

What I really fear is how it will still be England's fault if independence doesn't go as well as hoped...
Click to expand...

That'd only be idiots that would come out with that in any eventuallity.

Self determination is great but with it comes the same responsibilities. The two are inseparable.
 
RDM said:
Wasn't it the Black Douglas quote?



Which could be construed as somewhat anti-english.
Click to expand...

If you are a doughnut who can't connect the fact that the poster isn't racist or bigoted and it clearly flies in the face of what the tone and their opinions perhaps. It was tongue and cheek to the very morons who go 'lol brigadoon' to everything. But I suppose it was a bit dim witted given how it's backfired but again that says more on those who are desperate with the ad hominem due to lack of adequate argument.

Fed up of being called anti English merely for having pro Scottish political beliefs. Only here can I be accused of being the defender of minorities in one thread and anti English in the other.

Is quoting from the wars of independence Anti-English?

Is talking about history Anti English?
 
Last edited:
arknor said:
yea it was he did it to get a reaction from people brb making a new sig


or if you dont count he natural resources a lot less
Click to expand...

Do we not count natural resources for the UK's GDP?

I think not.

Again, your misunderstanding and lack of objectivity aren't my problem arknor the great.
 
yea but we dont count natural resources which would be disputed if scotland ever got independance or natural resources that are more likely to be considered property of the shetlands who might not want to be part of independant scotland
 
arknor said:
yea but we dont count natural resources which would be disputed if scotland ever got independance or natural resources that are more likely to be considered property of the shetlands who might not want to be part of independant scotland
Click to expand...

First part of that is nonsense and the second part is also largely irrelevent.
 
arknor said:
not really but if it doesnt suit your point of view just dismiss it as irrelevant
Click to expand...

Yes, the first part of your post is not economically correct it's mince.

The second part of your post is also irrelevant and has been covered with you before. All you can do is keep saying it.
 
Biohazard said:
The film is highly eroneous; however what makes it a wholy racist movie in your opinion?

Why are WWII movies not racist?
Click to expand...

There isn't one positive portrayal of the English in the entire film - they're presented as pederasts, rapists, cowards, fey homosexuals or evil tyrants. But then again Rob Roy is no better as was the trend at the time.

Whereas the Scots are portrayed a carefree bunch of mulleted sons of the Earth, peacefully going about their business. Never dreaming of hurting a soul unless provoked.

Anyway just take the screenwriter's surname - Wallace - the entire thing was a petty, self-serving fanatasy that Gibson turned into a Disney-fied bunch of crap.

And I'm sure there are many racist WW2 movies - Dambusters for a start for the name of the dog alone, but 2 of my favourite WW2 movies are Das Boot and All Quiet on the Western Front - an entirely German perspective.


.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom