Caporegime
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 77,572
- Location
- Wish i was in a Ramen Shop Counter
First car - narrowed it down to 2
- Thread starter Deific
- Start date
![[TW]Fox](/data/man-of-honor/2009.png){kind=avatar}
I too find it helps to translate my forum experiences into fictional tales about the outside world. It's a great coping mechanism.
You've never ever been mistaken ?
Crikey your arrogance is outstanding.
[TW]Fox;19473082 said:
Ah and a pretender to the perfect crown appears.
Last edited:
I posted the link in this thread already.
There's been little constructive criticism for me to take. It's mostly been, "har har fool, you're doing it wrong!". Well hopfully these screens prove otherwise. Lopez, I used compare the market after you posted those screens, and obviously the details you used are substantially different to my own. *Note I misclicked 1990 as birthyear, it should be 1989 - but that won't change it to the figures you're saying. I even put my mileage as a lowly 5000.
Last edited:
You have your voluntary excess to zero, that's going to make significant difference - for starters it will instantly rule out many insurers from your quote. You are choosing SDP only rather than commuting included, which also makes a difference. I went with standard factory fit alarm/immobiliser and no named drivers so as not to complicate things.
Other than that our quotes are largely the same - you can see the details I have used on my screenshot from Liverpool Victoria.
Other than that our quotes are largely the same - you can see the details I have used on my screenshot from Liverpool Victoria.
Voluntary excess can only be included if you go with comprehensive - and then it works out more expensive than TPFT even with the excess. SDP also works out cheaper, and I don't think the fact that I only put alarm and not immobiliser is the difference. Adding named drivers onto it also brings it down, so you've obviously changed things somewhere.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 77,572
- Location
- Wish i was in a Ramen Shop Counter
Try it and see?
Fine, pay your 3 grand insurance and be happy, I seriously cannot be arsed trying to help you any more.
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
ahah priceless? I point out that excess can only be used with comprehensive and that named drivers lower insurance and you come back with a comment like that? Farcicle.
Why would you insure a 4 grand car TPFT?
[TW]Fox;19473238 said:
I wouldn't, but I put that in simply to get the lowest quote i could - which is still nowhere near the 1500 quid people were throwing about before I posted the screenshots.
I did. The quotes were the same.
Wanted advice on which of the two cars I mentioned people thought was a better option, or if neither, what car they saw as a better option. Instead people thought it would be a good idea to scoff and insult, throwing around insurance figures which aren't realistic and then seemingly go quiet/defencive/insulting when I posted screenshots of exactly what I'm putting in - containing no outrageous mileage etc.
Last edited:
What is wrong with the £1300 Lopez has wasted his time trying to find you?
Lopez posted a screenshot; he's put the details exactly as you have... and got that quote. Do you really think he's faked it?
Read what you want to read and then get offended based on that. Typical MrLOL post?
He said the scenario you posted has never happened to him - as in he may well never say anything with 100% certainty or always caveats things he isn't sure about, just in case.