I'm not sure if they've just filmed it from the perspective of the same answer to slightly different questions and it was supposed to be cut with the best one selected.
Surely.........
It does feel like that but it isn't, the questions are different, the troubling and utterly not surprising thing is, it sounds like the reporter knows more about whats going on that Ed.
He's been given a single answer and no matter the question he's pouring out the same words, with a couple questions its a passable yet pointless answer with as per usual, no actual opinion on how to solve the problem. The 3rd time its embarassing and the answer is moving further away from the actual question, by the 5th identical response he's not even paying attention to whats being asked.
His brother knows about politics, he got into it for whatever reason, his brother won the majority of actual labour votes, Ed went to the unions and said "anything you want guys" and got a huge amount of votes from that. He has no clue whats going on, he really is a complete idiot, being played like a puppet by the unions. I didn't like Blair but he did some useful things, I hated Brown and thought he was borderline incompetant, Ed, I can't understand how he could get above a personal assistant level of responsibility for a political party.
Problem is the soundbites for that on the 6pm news will be one question, one answer and the public will never know what a complete idiot he is.
