Milly Dowler's voicemail was hacked by News of the Screws

Dolph · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:08

The irony of these threads is that there is a decent story and discussion, ruined by behaviour by the OP that would fit right in at a tabloid...

Cosimo · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:39

Azza said:
Really sickening if it's all true.

Burnsy2023 · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:39

Dolph said:
The irony of these threads is that there is a decent story and discussion, ruined by behaviour by the OP that would fit right in at a tabloid...

Indeed. I think Stockhausen is secretly a Sun journalist.

Pinkribbonscars · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:43

stockhausen said:
News of the Screws

When will you tire of these petty names? Are you aware of how irritating it makes you?

Biohazard · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:44

Dolph said:
The irony of these threads is that there is a decent story and discussion, ruined by behaviour by the OP that would fit right in at a tabloid...

The OP has done nothing wrong here. Set your personal grievances aside and stop poisoning the well when there is no need.

Burnsy2023 said:
Indeed. I think Stockhausen is secretly a Sun journalist.

And what is so bad about S/H here?

Danthus · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:48

Biohazard said:
The OP has done nothing wrong here. Set your personal grievances aside and stop poisoning the well when there is no need.

And what is so bad about S/H here?

This is evidence of Dolphs superior IQ.

Biohazard · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:49

OldCoals said:
This is evidence of Dolphs superior IQ.

No it isn't, it's evidence that he is more egotistical than he is intelligent.

Hatter The Mad · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:49

KNiVES · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:49

Murdoch Media means nothing will happen to them at all. It's not even a conspiracy theory to say that Cameron and co are in Murdoch's back pocket and nobody of any significant standing or value will go down for this. They will probably throw some poor minion under the bus saying he/she had 'gone rogue' and call it a day.

Dolph · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:49

Biohazard said:
The OP has done nothing wrong here. Set your personal grievances aside and stop poisoning the well when there is no need.

You don't think the OP poisoned the well from the start with the thread title and the unnecessary closing comment?

What about the totally unrealistic and very dodgy ideas-wise rant about banning Murdoch from UK media?

There is a good discussion possible on the subject, I was going to post about the issue myself, but it isn't possible with such an irrational OP.

MrMoonX · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:50

Biohazard said:
No it isn't, it's evidence that he is more egotistical than he is intelligent.

this, i love how he doesnt mention murdoch or jeremy hunt, probably cos that old aussie donates to his beloved party

Biohazard · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:50

Dolph said:
You don't think the OP poisoned the well from the start with the thread title and the unnecessary closing comment?

What about the totally unrealistic and very dodgy ideas-wise rant about banning Murdoch from UK media?

There is a good discussion possible on the subject, I was going to post about the issue myself, but it isn't possible with such an irrational OP.

Not at all, that is your bias.

Your reaction says more about your state of mind than his.

Get over it.

"andy" · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:51

Burnsy2023 said:
I don't think you can tar everyone with that brush. If you do then lolstockhausen.

why not ?

Gerard · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:53

Forde said:
I'm sure the rich people will avoid that.

Yup, one set of Rules for them, and another for everyone else.

Hatter The Mad · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:54

Biohazard said:
Not at all, that is your bias.

Your reaction says more about your state of mind than his.

Get over it.

You're the odd one out here - we can all see through stockhausen. You're choosing not to

RDM · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:55

Biohazard said:
The OP has done nothing wrong here. Set your personal grievances aside and stop poisoning the well when there is no need.

And what is so bad about S/H here?

Because rather than focusing on the story itself and the people involved in the story he has gone all tabloid and starting calling for the head of the person that owns shares in the conglomerate that owns the company that owns the paper. So rather than a solid complaint against frankly dispicable practices by a private investigator hired by the News of the World instead we get a tirade against Murdoch.

For all his bile against such tabloid reporting as the Mail, News of the World etc stockhousen has a habit of using similar tactics himself.

Biohazard · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:55

Hatter The Mad said:
You're the odd one out here - we can all see through stockhausen. You're choosing not to

No sweet heart, that would be impartiality.

I'm not the odd one out here, I'm not out to attack the character of someone who brings valid argument.

But blow me I bet this will resemble a Tory fan boi bee swarm very shortly.

Biohazard · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:56

RDM said:
Because rather than focusing on the story itself and the people involved in the story he has gone all tabloid and starting calling for the head of the person that owns shares in the conglomerate that owns the company that owns the paper. So rather than a solid complaint against frankly dispicable practices by a private investigator hired by the News of the World instead we get a tirade against Murdoch.

For all his bile against such tabloid reporting as the Mail, News of the World etc stockhousen has a habit of using similar tactics himself.

And here we go.

He finds the paper corrupted, so what?

Dj_Jestar · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:56

Wow. I am actually disgusted by that. Truly horrified that someone would even contemplate doing such a thing.

Nitefly · 4 Jul 2011 at 18:57

I honestly think the OCUK forums are like WWE wrestling story lines sometimes

As for the story, pretty appalling.