But it wasn't clear the deposit was non-refundable.
For what purpose?
So the owner holds the car incase they get other interested parties.
But it wasn't clear the deposit was non-refundable.
I think that just assuming the buyer accepts the deposit won't be refunded without being explicit about it is asking for trouble - a hassle that £250 probably wouldn't cover.
I've not once said a deposit should be refundable.
Why should it be, the only reason that it would be mentioned is if it is refundable.
A refundable deposit is a USP that businesses use, you always work on the assumption that it isn't.
Why do you keep flogging a dead horse? You are incorrect.![]()
Goes without saying really though doesn't it, always assume a deposit is non-refundable, that's in life lessons Chapter 1.
I'm just stunned that he put a deposit down without checking he could insure the car.
Absolutely moronic.
I can't believe you gave it all back. Giving some of it back as goodwill would have been admirable. Giving it all back sounds like we are missing something..
If it was made crystal clear the deposit was not refundable Foxtrot26 would have been more confident to keep the money. It would then be up to Foxtro26 to decide if keeping the money was worth any potential reprisals.
[TW]Fox;19840011 said:So why ask for a deposit?
Advice.org says a deposit can be refundable if agreed so beforehand under certain circumstances.
You are also ignoring the issue that the buyer expected the deposit back - right or wrong. Foxtrot26 decided to give it back. For all we know the buyer could have turned nasty on him and caused trouble for Foxtrot26.
What is said in a forum and what happens in real life is quite different. Not so easy to tell someone to do one when they are on your doorstep. Foxtrot26 goes to car next morning and its scratched to heck. What then?
Peace of mind?