Based upon which engine bench running, endurance and wear testing do you base these reduced oil service schedules on?
Irrelevant. It does no harm, especially given the fact that all my cars are thrashed daily, regularly used for competitive events etc.
It will be based on the combination of extensive testing and the knowledge of Porsche and whichever oil manufacturer is producing the oil for them. Marketing wouldn't be allowed to extend the recommended life of the oil, it's not for them to decide.
You'd love to think so, but if Engineer says - 10k mile services gives an average lifespan of around 200k miles. Marketing say - how long would it last with 20k mile services? 100k on average - good, job done.
This is by no means an accurate portrayal of what happens, or how decisions are made, but
merely an example - manufacturers don't care if their cars are unreliable past 100k miles so if they could increase sales by say 25% just by changing the service schedule from 10k to 20k for example, do you think they are really going to care?
I think you'd have to be a fool to think that the Engineers recommendation on optimal oil changes makes it directly into the service schedule.
[TW]Fox;20293065 said:
Whilst I can understand this thought about a diesel rep car, sold on its ownership cost, I cannot imagine many new Porsche owners only own one because of the 20k service intervals.
True, or you could look at it as aiding customer purchase justification.
"Hey, I'd love a Porsche, but they cost a fortune to run".
"Not true sir - you only need to service bi-anually"
"So I get a Porsche and it only needs servicing half as much as my old Golf? Where do I sign".
We all know how much average Joe gets caught up on trivial figures like servicing, Tax etc.