Poll: Rebels rolling into Tripoli

Were we right to get involved in Libya?

  • Yes

    Votes: 291 49.7%

  • No

    Votes: 294 50.3%
  • Total voters
    585
if anti war activists and experts wouldnt look like such god damn loonies they would help their own cause so much by having a shower and a hair cut!

Not that I care, glad hes dead.
 
Orcish-Horde said:
He came to as violent a death as many of his victims, that would be closure enough for most. At lest they were spared the indignity of him showboating in a courtroom.
Click to expand...

I'm not so sure. I still think a fair amount would have liked to see him tried and convicted of his crimes, a chance for a fair trial. There will be many unanswered questions now which may not have been the case were it not for his summary execution.

He could well have been indignant and defiant in court, it doesn't mean you bypass the process because of it.
 
scorza said:
It's easy to say that from the comfort of the UK. I think I'd be pretty happy if the man who almost starved me and my family* on a whim was overthrown and killed.

*Refers to the incident I heard on the radio from John Simpson when Gaddafi decided that shops were a nest of exploitation so banned them.
Click to expand...

Your trying to say Gaddafi banned shops? That just dont make sense, the country wouldn't run at all. He was running it for 40 years.
 
So we depose one murderous scumbag, so we can put new pet murderous scumbags in his place. We had no right to get involved in Libya, it was a civil war, and with these scenes shown around the world we just look even more dirty than we are already.
 
simulatorman said:
The Iranian ayatollah's channel which has nothing on RT.
Click to expand...

but they cover news you dont see on western channels. American riots ect.

Uther said:
So we depose one murderous scumbag, so we can put new pet murderous scumbags in his place. We had no right to get involved in Libya, it was a civil war, and with these scenes shown around the world we just look even more dirty than we are already.
Click to expand...

you know the only reason we stepped in Libya was for the protection of economical interests. You think David Cameron actually gives a **** about Libyans dying?
 
Last edited:
Feel a bit sickened really at the thought that we are essentially complicit in this. Why do we always have to poke our noses in? If the Arab League were wanting to protect civilians then we should have let them do it and stayed out of it ourselves.

I know he was not a good person and has done some evil things during his life, but executing him in this way just isn't the way to go about it IMO.
 
dasyad said:
Feel a bit sickened really at the thought that we are essentially complicit in this. Why do we always have to poke our noses in? If the Arab League were wanting to protect civilians then we should have let them do it and stayed out of it ourselves..
Click to expand...

Exactly how I feel, Cameron is no better than Blair. Only this time the Yanks got the lap dogs to do the work and then instantly started to distance themselves from it.
 
Mickie said:
you watch one video and believe every word ?
Click to expand...

people do it with the bbc all the time and sky news ;)

you need to watch what the different news sources around the world are saying to get the real picture as they all offer biased reports, its best to watch a few and make your own mind up.

reporters dont report anymore they tell you what to think
 
Best thing to do is browse OcUK forums because we have people on here with the real inside story and the real reasons behind things.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom