Huge accident on M5

[TW]Fox;20499621 said:
Absolutely agree with you. It is not a good thing when visibility is severely reduced but we dont normally get a 52 vehicle pileup each time it happens. I regularly drive on the A35 and between Bridport and Dorchester of an evening because of how close it is to the coast there is often thick fog and very poor visibility. There are not normally pileups.

SOMEBODY either made a mistake or was not driving with due care and attention, otherwise it wouldn't have happened.

I am sound motorist but at times I get into a mode of routine, can drive along and spot disasters/people pulling out, biggest training is from cycling, that makes you look at any junction or drive, it hurts when you come off you bike, came off in the summer, was only going 10 mph but it shuck me up, minor accident and I was bruised, mavity is a bitch when you are on 2 wheels.

Also I am keen to make sure I am right and enforce road rage, hate it but when I am at the wheel, I have to prove them wrong.

Being in a car = nice and safe, until it goes wrong, when you have fireman prising your door off, that is great, that's if they can get to you in time!
 
Last edited:
What I dont understand is even if they prove or show that smoke or fog had occurred on the M5 how does this suddenly cause a 52 vehicle pile up.

It can only prove that someone could not drive in adverse conditions and panicked or made a rash judgement.

Well after watching a witness statement on the News the woman said the Iceland lorry in front was there and a split second later it was gone.
I've been driving daily for many years and I've hit fog countless times but I've always been able to see the lights on the vehicle in front.
The worst fog I can ever remember was about 5 years ago coming back from Stafford through Sandon but I could still see rear lights and it was that bad that if I hadn't got my TomTom I would have pulled over somewhere.
This woman said it went pitch black and just remember she isn't covering her arse and I'm sure if she saw somebody do something wrong she would have said.
 
i was just thinking, did you even watch the motoGP?

i guess my post would make more sence if you had watched it

No I didn't, but I don't see how it can be comparable. Racing you purposely have close and fast driving.
Even if your talking about a lorry jackknifing and take out cars in the other two lanes. That doesnt acconunt for the other couple of dozen cars evolved,

It would be great to know the following distance of all vehicles involved when they went though bridge CCTV in the miles leading upto the accident.
 
Last edited:
i was just trying to point out how little can be done if someone hits you from the side.

from the pictures posted up in this thread you can see the trucks blocking all lanes
 
I think its clear that someone made a mistake but what caused that mistake remains to be seen of course. I keep thinking this supposed fog/smoke suddenly caused one or more drivers to panic, a bit like driving along and having a bag put over your head, the instant reaction would be to brake sharply or slow down, a poor choice but that's what panic does to people. If that is what happened, and like I said that remains to be seen, could this have been avoided? Can anyone honestly say that facing the same scenario we wouldn't all panic?
 
[TW]Fox;20499649 said:
Of all the speculation so far I think the one about a car joining the Motorway without giving away seems the most likely - this coupled with the poor visibility from the fireworks = not a great combination. There seemed to be quite a lot of police focus in two cars parked almost half a mile further up the road.

I see on Sky news just now ,they reckon it was a bank of black smoke that came across the motorway from the firework display,(presumably the rugby club) that was the likely cause of the accident and police are treating it as a criminal investigation aswell as an RTC.
From what the police chief said ,I think the organisers of the firework display could well be in the ****.
Apparently, a couple of years ago a firework organiser refused to do a gig there because he felt it would be dangerous due to the proximity of the motorway.....
 
what did the first car hit? next to the first HGV, to its left, its hit something but nothing is in front of it.. strange

it also looks like the last HGV has gone into the back of most of the cars at the back of the pack..

looking at the pics too, some of the crashed cars dont look too bad really, i think the people that had died got pinned in the car rather than dying on inpact, they must not have been going that fast, honestly looks like they got pushed around by the HGVs and fire killed them.
 
did anyone check the metoffice on friday ? would be nice to know which way the wind was blowing..


its the HGVs, look at the pics, all 6 were in the left lane, all 6 behind each other.

1st HGV in the left lane, came to a stop for some un-known reason, second HGVs back end still in left lane, fronts pulled out, taking cars with it, 3rd TNT HGV jackknifed in left lane behind 2nd HGV, hitting 5 cars, 4th HGV getting pulled across 3 lanes by 3rd HGVs trailer having hit the back, again taking cars with it, 5th hits the back end of 4th HGV it bursts into flames pinning cars against barrier, also setting them a light, 6th HGV hits the back of 5th HGV hard

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-blame-fireworks-organiser-insists-fault.html

you can see how all the HGVs were following each other if you look at the pics
 
Last edited:
what did the first car hit? next to the first HGV, to its left, its hit something but nothing is in front of it.. strange

it also looks like the last HGV has gone into the back of most of the cars at the back of the pack..

looking at the pics too, some of the crashed cars dont look too bad really, i think the people that had died got pinned in the car rather than dying on inpact, they must not have been going that fast, honestly looks like they got pushed around by the HGVs and fire killed them.



The amount of cars in front of the Iceland and TNT trucks tells me the trucks were possibly - I say that with caution! - innocent parties in the initial accident. The police where paying a lot of attention to a mazda about half a mile up from the scene that also had damaged on it.

We may well never know for certain what caused it, as others have said it could have been any number of reasons mechanical failure, some kind of health issue (like a heart attack) or simply bad driving by one or two people up at the front. It is also possible that the person who caused it all didn't even realise and carried on with their journey unaware of the carnage that happened in the fog behind them.

The fog was a factor, one of many though.

Over the years many of the accidents of this type that I can remember have happened when it has been foggy so if there is any good at all to come out of this situation then perhaps we will all drive that little bit more slowly and carefully in the fog this winter to reduce the chance of something similar happening again.

did anyone check the metoffice on friday ? would be nice to know which way the wind was blowing..


its the HGVs, look at the pics, all 6 were in the left lane, all 6 behind each other.

1st HGV in the left lane, came to a stop for some un-known reason, second HGVs back end still in left lane, fronts pulled out, taking cars with it, 3rd TNT HGV jackknifed in left lane behind 2nd HGV, hitting 5 cars, 4th HGV getting pulled across 3 lanes by 3rd HGVs trailer having hit the back, again taking cars with it, 5th hits the back end of 4th HGV it bursts into flames pinning cars against barrier, also setting them a light, 6th HGV hits the back of 5th HGV hard

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-blame-fireworks-organiser-insists-fault.html

you can see how all the HGVs were following each other if you look at the pics

The HGV's were all following each other? what else would they be doing?:confused: They would have been in a line, on cruise control most likely, doing circa 50 - 55mph,assuming it was clear prior to the accident....
I would actually say the HGV's were caught up in the aftermath of an initial, smaller impact - the possible reason for the first HGV inexplicably stopping.

On ITV, they mentioned all of the victims that died by name but then said 2 lorry drivers from Cornwall make the death toll 7.
I wondered why this was initially, that they had not named the drivers, I have subseqently learned that there was two Samworth trucks involved and two of the drivers were in the same cab , both of whom have died and the third driver, in the 2nd Samworth truck is critical in hospital....Without wanting to get too graphic the two in the first truck may not have been formally identified yet due to the fire. They know which vehicle(s) they came from and probably know who they should be but without formal identification, they won't release names which could, unlikely but could, later prove to be wrong. It could take dental records or DNA to identify them.

Sadly, some of the HGV drivers that your so quick to judge are not here to defend themselves,they have died & horribly, doing a job that this country, like it or not, would be screwed without!

I'd wait for the official enquiry before dishing out blame if I were you.

Patchy rolling fog is on of those things that you need to see and then take action to reduce speed "before" you run into it because if not it's often too late.If it's an unlit motorway at night the only way that you'll see it in time is by use of the main beam headlights because the dipped headlights won't pick it out rolling across in front of you until it's too late.

The accident scene is just after Jct25, which runs uphill , it could have been a slow truck or car had run up to join the motorway and everyone couldnt get out of the lanes in time,or it could have been the usual "I'll just pull on to the motorway and hope for the best" scanario that we have all seen before, but not to this extent, it could have been travelling in a wall of smoke & fog with no street lighting - that section of the M5 is unlit -, in wet conditions....

I can only hope seeing this accident reported in pictures on the TV & the net has taught the travelling masses how vulnerable we all are out on the road.

Stay safe people.
 
Last edited:
I see on Sky news just now ,they reckon it was a bank of black smoke that came across the motorway from the firework display,(presumably the rugby club) that was the likely cause of the accident and police are treating it as a criminal investigation aswell as an RTC.
From what the police chief said ,I think the organisers of the firework display could well be in the ****.
Apparently, a couple of years ago a firework organiser refused to do a gig there because he felt it would be dangerous due to the proximity of the motorway.....

I thought this was most likely going to be the case when the survivors first gave accounts of it being caused by a "black fog". Smoke trapped within fog would have made even fog lights useless and turned every driver inside the fog into stevie wonder, there's a pretty simple reason they don't let blind people drive, not really anything anyone on the motorway could have done to avoid what happened :(
 
I see on Sky news just now ,they reckon it was a bank of black smoke that came across the motorway from the firework display,(presumably the rugby club) that was the likely cause of the accident and police are treating it as a criminal investigation aswell as an RTC.
From what the police chief said ,I think the organisers of the firework display could well be in the ****.
Apparently, a couple of years ago a firework organiser refused to do a gig there because he felt it would be dangerous due to the proximity of the motorway.....

No way the the smoke/fog caused it, why would someone make sudden movement due to smoke or fog, the slip road is the key, not the fireworks or smoke.
 
i agree, though they were going too fast to have crashed, what they probably couldnt see was a wall of trailer across 2 lanes, 1st lane having the HGV in it and a lot of them being pushed along by a HGV..

the HGVs could have easly come to a stop very fast once the trailer on the TNT HGV dug into the barrier far left and 4th HGVs cabbin on the far right..

faced with a wall and thick fog, a lot of them obviously crashed, got pinned and died by fire, some of the cars beside the 4th HGV could have been speeding, a lot of the others dont look like they could have been speeding at all, but rather pushed to the side.
 
ive just watched a few crash tests at 30mph and they look exactly the same as the cars crashed on the m5 junction 25.

the difference being, the cars on the m5, being pinned in and burnt..

i honestly dont think they were speeding, i think something hit the first HGV and the rest of the HGVs were tailgating, as ive seen them do a lot..

look a the 5th and 6th HGVs, the cabbins are gone, obviously they're burnt to the ground but the cabbins should still be there, but they're not, they are totalled

i claim, the 5th and 6th HGV drives killed on impact, the other 5 being pinned in their cars and burnt alive, as bad as that sounds
 
Last edited:
ive just watched a few crash tests at 30mph and they look exactly the same as the cars crashed on the m5 junction 25.

the difference being, the cars on the m5, being pinned in and burnt..

i honestly dont think they were speeding, i think something hit the first HGV and the rest of the HGVs were tailgating, as ive seen them do a lot..

look a the 5th and 6th HGVs, the cabbins are gone, obviously they're burnt to the ground but the cabbins should still be there, but they're not, they are totalled

i claim, the 5th and 6th HGV drives killed on impact, the other 5 being pinned in their cars and burnt alive, as bad as that sounds

...awaiting the early morning posters to pick that argument to bits.
 
ive just watched a few crash tests at 30mph and they look exactly the same as the cars crashed on the m5 junction 25.

the difference being, the cars on the m5, being pinned in and burnt..

i honestly dont think they were speeding, i think something hit the first HGV and the rest of the HGVs were tailgating, as ive seen them do a lot..

look a the 5th and 6th HGVs, the cabbins are gone, obviously they're burnt to the ground but the cabbins should still be there, but they're not, they are totalled

i claim, the 5th and 6th HGV drives killed on impact, the other 5 being pinned in their cars and burnt alive, as bad as that sounds


Tailgating - I see it too, all the time, but believe me, at 44tons @55MPH you don't have to be tailgating to suddenly run into a wall of an accident right out of nowhere with no chance of stopping.

In the heat of those fires, the cabs would have melted. I've seen this , first hand.

The accident is not, imo, one clear cause, its a deadly fateful mix of unfortunate circumstances that we see daily, but usually without this drastic end result.

Grace of God & all that.......... :(
 
Last edited:
its obvious the two last trucks have hit each other hard, as they, like you have said, died, not sure if the last two HGV drivers have died or just 1 with the other being in hospital..

fair enough, there stopping distances need to be huge and there being fog, they probably couldnt guage the stopping distance as well as a car, though i think the cars did a good job of stopping ok, crashing at around 30mph isnt too bad..

i totally respect HGV drivers btw, im just trying to work all this out as best i can, the police need to find out what made the 1st HGV driver stop
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom