But now that you have, then why do people still fight it?
i.e. Quink over there.
Why?![]()
Because you are belittling me. I was never taught this. Ever. Yet you still take the ****

But now that you have, then why do people still fight it?
i.e. Quink over there.
Why?![]()
Because you are belittling me. I was never taught this. Ever. Yet you still take the ****![]()
But now that you have, then why do people still fight it?
i.e. Quink over there.
Why?![]()
Well it wasn't - get over it.
Which part? All of what I said are true. If i did I apologise.
If you are arguing because you think I am belittling you, it still doesn't change the fact that you are wrong.
The 2 things are irrelevant and independent of each other.
Because you are belittling me. I was never taught this. Ever. Yet you still take the ****![]()
so what is it?
You're wrong though.
No if's not butts or any other sort of arguement.
In the absence of brackets, you do not just go from left to right, you apply the rules according to order of operations.
Brackets
Orders (Indices)
Division
Multiplication
Addition
Subtraction
So as there are no brackets, no orders and no division, the first operator you use is the multiplication (40x0), then the addition.
You do, 40 x 0 = 0. Then move on to the addition, which is 40 + 0 + 1 = 41.
I was taught this at school in the United Kingdom too.
I can understand perhaps not being taught it in terms of the little BODMAS thing but surely you had to learn these rules at some point, as they are the basic underpinnings of algebra, without them you can't really progress any further than long division and percentages?![]()
Bock bock bock bkaaaaaaaaaaaah![]()
Say Wha'?
It's 41, using the correct and only method to work it out.
BIDMAS / BODMAS.
When? What year? Ta![]()
A while agohahaha
Everything I done had brackets round it. I genuinely never done it without the brackets.