My wife is a teacher and is striking tomorrow.
She works over 60 hour weeks, only being paid for 40. Works through lunchtimes for detentions, after schools and occasionally school trips at weekends etc.
She will not get paid for striking tomorrow.
How is it fair, to start a career long job with an employer, plan your life and then the employer (read gov.) move the goalposts. We re not just talking moving them slighttly left or right here either, its moving them to a whole new pitch.
I think people would be more willing to accept the pensions problem if the gov. made a small change, i.e. exisiting teachers pay a higher contrib BUT still retire on the same pension at the same age.
I also think if they want to rape you in all three holes, do it to people who are joining the industry, not existing workers who again have their lives mapped.
The government will back down, the unions will not.
and as for splitting the work force with this 10 years existing crap, that is just damn right dirty.
She works over 60 hour weeks, only being paid for 40. Works through lunchtimes for detentions, after schools and occasionally school trips at weekends etc.
She will not get paid for striking tomorrow.
How is it fair, to start a career long job with an employer, plan your life and then the employer (read gov.) move the goalposts. We re not just talking moving them slighttly left or right here either, its moving them to a whole new pitch.
I think people would be more willing to accept the pensions problem if the gov. made a small change, i.e. exisiting teachers pay a higher contrib BUT still retire on the same pension at the same age.
I also think if they want to rape you in all three holes, do it to people who are joining the industry, not existing workers who again have their lives mapped.
The government will back down, the unions will not.
and as for splitting the work force with this 10 years existing crap, that is just damn right dirty.