Worst I am poor and can't afford a $3500 USB cable thread ever.

Ffs, of course they are expensive.

It takes a lot of time to go through the research for materials, perform Phase I trials to check differences with tech equipment, then moving through to phase II to check the results on people doing thorough double blinded tests, to ensure that the product is effective and produces results that really matter to people.

Stuff like this takes these companies literally minutes, and that's before they've started to think about a product name.
 
For that price it should eradicate all interference, probably only to be used be ultra sensitive amps and speakers etc. Really expensive for 3ft of cable though lol.
 
i always ask the same question whenever i see these ridonculous threads: what equipment do they think was used to record the music they are listening to? :eek:
 
I purchased one of these for charging my galaxy s II.

It was amazing - I was actually able to feel the power seeping into my mobile phone. It didn't just charge it, it made it sing with energy.
 
Looks like he's sleeved a USB cable with tacky silver braid and slapped some heatshrink on the ends with his own logo.

LOL
 
Maybe we are missing something. Maybe these cables withstand absolute zero temperatures and can be used in mariana trench or something. Or maybe it can be used to network Wave Sink Device with Massive Dynamic lan in parallel universe through tear hole.
 
My £5 watch tell the time just as well as an expensive one.

/controversial

1) you look a ***** for wearing that £5 POS
2) it won't keep time for long before going out
D) you're doing it wrong
 
isn't this for use with professional recording equipment which is sensitive to interference? Not justifying it but that that might be what it's aimed at...
 
isn't this for use with professional recording equipment which is sensitive to interference? Not justifying it but that that might be what it's aimed at...

No.
Unless your recording equipment is next to a 5kw motor then yes, but otherwise this is aimed at rich men who don't know their 1s from their zeros.
 
isn't this for use with professional recording equipment which is sensitive to interference? Not justifying it but that that might be what it's aimed at...

Srsly?

USB is digital. The signal is sent in the form of 1s and 0s and rebuilt using error correction at the source.

Providing there aren't massive errors in the transmitted signal (that overstep quantisation / error correction) then it gets rebuilt on the other side EXACTLY as it was sent.

Shielding helps over long distance, but it's minimal in preventing errors, and laughable to make out its essential for anything less than 15-20M. The way the seller makes out, any attempt to use any other USB cable is bad, is just delusional.

In fact, it reminds me of a time someone told me about some directional copper speaker cable. He was ranting and raving about this stuff.. Insisting it had to go a certain way or the sound would be distorted.. Until I asked "how can it directional? It's a piece of 24 gauge solid copper wire!?"

He just rolled his eyes and carried on in the belief I was talking arse. Perhaps he didn't like it when I then asked how he knew if the kettle or toaster were wired up using directional copper wiring, or perhaps he was so brainwashed by the likes of what hi fi, he stopped listening to reason.

Live and let live. It's their money to burn.. Just LOL at those stupid enough to eat the crap.
 
Back
Top Bottom