30/11 Strikes.

"I love how this person captured the mood of the nation by agreeing with my point of view"

"No, i love how this person captured the mood of the nation by doing something that i agree with."

Kapeesh?

Seems they are simply agreeing with the perspective of someones statement from the basis of their own....

All I said was I doubt Matt Smith was indicative of the rest of the Nation, the same would be true of Jeremy Clarkson. That is not agreeing with anyone, or ascribing anything to be the mood of any majority, silent or otherwise.


And it's Capiche or Capisce....Capische!
 
That is it's stated aim.....thus Matt Smith should be censured, if he did indeed make such a politically biased statement while discharging his duties as a BBC presenter.

It's hard to remain impartial if they are trying to argue questions that segments of their viewers would like to ask, would be the sort of response. They would claim it was counterbalanced with other views etc.

That is how the BBC works.
 
It's hard to remain impartial if they are trying to argue questions that segments of their viewers would like to ask. They would claim it was counterbalanced with other views etc.

That is how the BBC works.

They are supposed to be impartial as Presenters....to give alternative views they have guests or commentators to offer such counterbalance.

He shouldn't have done it, he is adddressing his personal opinion as that of the BBC in his capacity as the Presenter of The One Show. I understand that it is a light entertainment show, but nonetheless the presenter in that capacity should remain impartial regardless. He made a specific statement, he wasn't offering an alternative or fielding a question or trying to illicit a responce from an interviewee...he made a personal political statement.....that is a no-no.
 
Last edited:
They are supposed to be impartial as Presenters....to give alternative views they have guests or commentators to offer such counterbalance.

He shouldn't have done it, he is adddressing his personal opinion as that of the BBC in his capacity as the Presenter of The One Show. I understand that it is a light entertainment show, but nonetheless the presenter in that capacity should remain impartial regardless. He made a specific statement, he wasn't offering an alternative or fielding a question or trying to illicit a responce from an interviewee...he made a personal political statement.....that is a no-no.

Is there anywhere I can see this?

Hard to second guess answer for someone else without context. I'm not a fan of the BBC, but you'll get no where with trying to complain or neuter it.
 
Is there anywhere I can see this?

Hard to second guess answer for someone else without context. I'm not a fan of the BBC, but you'll get no where with trying to complain or neuter it.

It just seems to go against their stated criteria for impartiality.....

What would you say if he said something negatively provocative against Alex Salmond....he isn't supposed to give his opinion, he is supposed to field others....


EDIT: ignore this, having seen the actual footage, thanks to Permabanned, it is nothing like a political statement or indicative of anything.
 
Last edited:

"Am i going to do it? It's now or never. I'm going to do it. I'm actually going to do it. Holy **** i did it!"

:D

Jesus.....is that what was said......ignore everything I said on the matter....the way it was put forward by Scorza was as if he made some politically biased statement to camera....

:eek:
 
I'd say that was a bit out of order to be honest.

I don't have an opinion on the strikes and they didn't cause me any problems so meh.

I doubt it had any political motivation, Matt Baker is hardly Billy Bragg....he's probably feeling a bit of a div today after all the twitter malarky.
 
Back
Top Bottom