If you want your snakes to eat live food release it into the wild.
What nature are you talking abut, cats are domesticated animals, pet snakes are not in their natural habitat, they have no threat of a predator eating them.
You can't apply nature law when the rules have far changed.
If you want your snakes to eat live food release it into the wild.
So what is the difference between a rat and a kitten? If he fed it a Guinea pig would the reaction be the same as the rat or the kitten??
so being crushed to death by a snake is fine?
Well that's not true, unless you mean stuff like locusts/crickets for lizards.
For me, yes. I take issue with the fact he acquired a pet from someone and used it as food and entertainment, which is clearly not what a pet is for.So what is the difference between a rat and a kitten? If he fed it a Guinea pig would the reaction be the same as the rat or the kitten??
Nature will happen, leave a snake alone it will kill anything it can.
Just like cats are "domestic iced" bs. They go hunting as its in their genetics. They reguly bring back song birds, rats and anything else they can get their paws on.
For me, yes. I take issue with the fact he acquired a pet from someone and used it as food and entertainment, which is clearly not what a pet is for.
The same way I'd find it disgusting if he were to kill the cat himself and eat it.
Exactly cats go out and do that, you don't see anybody buying a bird and feeding it live to their cat.
I felt angered, though I'm at a loss as to why. Maybe because I have cats I feel emotionally invested.
Nature will happen, leave a snake alone it will kill anything it can.
Just like cats are "domestic iced" bs. They go hunting as its in their genetics. They reguly bring back song birds, rats and anything else they can get their paws on.
And?
Cats will eat pretty much everything and I think you would be prosecuted if you let your snake out to hunt.
Daft argument.
i think theres something wrong with you mate.
Exactly cats go out and do that, you don't see anybody buying a bird and feeding it live to their cat.
For me, yes. I take issue with the fact he acquired a pet from someone and used it as food and entertainment, which is clearly not what a pet is for.
The same way I'd find it disgusting if he were to kill the cat himself and eat it.
Ive been around snakes since i was little, most places and reptile houses breed mice purely to feed and most live.
some have ones that feed on the dead, this just makes it easier to 'keep as a pet' but most just feed live.
Its more natural for the snake and healthier, you know the food is fit for purpose if its alive.
Still if not the reptiles still have to killed before been frozen anyway so either way its left to the snake to kill and eat or to humans to kill and freeze!
You don't think so? If he'd bought a rat as a pet, dressed it up, and fed it to his snake, all filmed for the internet?Pretty much this. As much as it annoys me there's no difference really whether it's a cat or a rat other than how people perceive them. It definitely wouldn't make the "news" if it was a rat.
And?
Cats will eat pretty much everything and I think you would be prosecuted if you let your snake out to hunt.
Daft argument.