Permabanned
- Joined
- 18 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 368
- Location
- Aberystwyth
This is my opinion. I think they were and ill explain why.
Don't get me wrong, they produced immense instrumentals and I think thats why they appealed to so many people. However, I'm one of those people who enjoy quality lyrics with a deep story behind, something maybe emotional that you feel. For me, other than the songs Let it be and Hey Jude, The Beatles just do not achieve this in the slightest. One of the main reasons Hey Jude has such an effect on me is from singing it at football games watching Cardiff City
Now, Oasis, a band that has openly stated to be influenced by The Beatles, do. This is purely down to lyrical content. For me they have better lyrics. They make much more sense, tell better stories with their songs and they relate to me more.
I mean, The Beatles sang songs like 'Drive my car' which to me has atrocious lyrics. The type of lyrics that would get blasted if produced by a modern artist. Now I know they had less resources to work with but their vocabulary would have been the same in terms of English so there really is no defence. I found they sang much more meaningful songs as solo artists or separate from The Beatles, i.e. Paul McCartney and Michael Jackson.
However I'm routinely knocked or put under scrutiny for holding this opinion when I feel its valid. Im not going to lie and say I like them as a band because to me they produced moments of true genius but a lot was garbage.
For me, the Jackson 5 were better. I don't understand how so many people haven't got soul in their blood. My father tells me its because I have black blood in me which means I have soul and thats why I appreciate true and proper music. Also, with the Jackson 5, the other singers sang a lot more and actually had truly soulful and amazing voices that just hit a nerve in your spine.
Anyone else feel this way?
Don't get me wrong, they produced immense instrumentals and I think thats why they appealed to so many people. However, I'm one of those people who enjoy quality lyrics with a deep story behind, something maybe emotional that you feel. For me, other than the songs Let it be and Hey Jude, The Beatles just do not achieve this in the slightest. One of the main reasons Hey Jude has such an effect on me is from singing it at football games watching Cardiff City

Now, Oasis, a band that has openly stated to be influenced by The Beatles, do. This is purely down to lyrical content. For me they have better lyrics. They make much more sense, tell better stories with their songs and they relate to me more.
I mean, The Beatles sang songs like 'Drive my car' which to me has atrocious lyrics. The type of lyrics that would get blasted if produced by a modern artist. Now I know they had less resources to work with but their vocabulary would have been the same in terms of English so there really is no defence. I found they sang much more meaningful songs as solo artists or separate from The Beatles, i.e. Paul McCartney and Michael Jackson.
However I'm routinely knocked or put under scrutiny for holding this opinion when I feel its valid. Im not going to lie and say I like them as a band because to me they produced moments of true genius but a lot was garbage.
For me, the Jackson 5 were better. I don't understand how so many people haven't got soul in their blood. My father tells me its because I have black blood in me which means I have soul and thats why I appreciate true and proper music. Also, with the Jackson 5, the other singers sang a lot more and actually had truly soulful and amazing voices that just hit a nerve in your spine.
Anyone else feel this way?