what an awful video. the (what looks like to be the smallest) of the attackers (who is rolling around drunk at the end) puts in some kicks that could easily have killed the victim. the bloke should've faught back more but what i don't understand the most is why the police don't cuff any of the attackers?
Muslim girl gang escape jail after judge hears 'they weren't used to drinking because of their relig
- Thread starter Robbo
- Start date
All taken with a bucket of salt due to the source, but how did the they judge accept that 'they' felt they were victims of unreasonable force from the also drunk bloke? They were attacking the woman on and off, he warmed up to hitting rather than just lashing out. Punching was justified in my opinion as they carried on attacking. Perhaps what he said is being taken out of context?
Also, did anything happen prior to this attack that made these women SPECIFICALLY go after the woman?
Also, did anything happen prior to this attack that made these women SPECIFICALLY go after the woman?
probably. i would assume that's why the judgement is what it is.
I'm sure when you arrive at a scene you don't really know what happened immediately, unless they were called in by the camera operator? Also, regardless of what they've been told they have to assess the situation.
It says in the article: they were charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm and convicted of that. Also it was at crown court which shows that it was treated seriously, well by everyone except the judge it seems
i would think they were called in by the camera operator as it is clearly manned and zooms in. if it was a bunch of lads fighting, they'd have cuffed them immediatley, surely? that's what happens on the 'drunk brits' or whatever it's called tv show.
I watched the CCTV footage of the attack that had taken place and I cant understand why the boyfriend didn't plant one on any of the the girls beating on his girlfriend :-/. He just fapped about whilst holding her bag and coat lol.
Don't get me wrong I'm not into hitting woman but if I was out and about with my girlfriend and she was pounced upon by a group of individuals, they would get warned once to back away then I would start throwing haymakers at their chinny chin chins.
I was wrong I re watched it again and he did plant a few on the girls in question, good for him.
Don't get me wrong I'm not into hitting woman but if I was out and about with my girlfriend and she was pounced upon by a group of individuals, they would get warned once to back away then I would start throwing haymakers at their chinny chin chins.
I was wrong I re watched it again and he did plant a few on the girls in question, good for him.
Last edited:
I think we can all agree that the sentence seems to be pretty light considering the offence, but I am not sure if it is unusual as I don't really have much experience in people that have commited assault occassioning actual bodily harm. For all I know it may be a standard sentence for that sort of offence.
From reading around the subject it seems that whilst racial insults were used the attack itself was not racially motivated, the girls being drunk and the interaction between them and the victim seemed to be what sparked it, not skin colour.
The Daily Mail, as per usual, is doing some pretty poor reporting trying to insinuate that it was because of their religion that they got off so lightly. Again this doesn't seem to be the case, it may well have been what the defense tried to use but the judge doesn't seem to have made mention of it.
From reading around the subject it seems that whilst racial insults were used the attack itself was not racially motivated, the girls being drunk and the interaction between them and the victim seemed to be what sparked it, not skin colour.
The Daily Mail, as per usual, is doing some pretty poor reporting trying to insinuate that it was because of their religion that they got off so lightly. Again this doesn't seem to be the case, it may well have been what the defense tried to use but the judge doesn't seem to have made mention of it.
Associate
- Joined
- 8 Sep 2008
- Posts
- 1,242
- Location
- Birmingham
I just watched the video and I'm disgusted by it. To be fair to the guy, he didn't do to badly, as he was dealing with one or two of them, the others would get around him. He could have been and should have been much more forceful though, especially given how viciously his girl was being attacked.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 16 Oct 2011
- Posts
- 250
typical anti-muslim thread, if it was a bunch of white lads you wouldnt make this thread. Whats them being muslim got to do with it.
The fact they used being Muslim as an excuse for carrying out the crime while screaming "kill the white ****"?
kinda makes both their religion and their racist views very relevant.
The fact they got a lesser sentence because they were muslim and not used to drinking. or so the judge says.
I would agree with you under other circumstances.
But apparently, the judge said that they couldn't handle their drink because they were Muslim which is why he gave them such a joke of a sentence.
I think the judge and the Daily Mail is full of **** tbh.
Don't shoot the messenger.
Try a broadsheet, the story is genuine.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...drinking-walk-free-after-attack-on-woman.html