Or Fud should be ignored and real AMD sources were saying well over a month ago that the 7950 was due a month after the 7970.
Delay? No, random sites making up date for a 7950, then announcing the real date + sayings it's delayed.
its like me today putting up a story that Ivy will launch in Feb the 15th, and in 2 weeks posting a new story saying its been delayed till April the 8th, thing is, the date was April the 8th the whole time.
It's unsurprising, if not particularly useful that AMD wanted to "launch" the 7970 in 2011 seeing as they said they would, nor that they want to "launch" the 7950 at CES because, well what do we know about the 7950? They will be available at launch with custom pcb's and coolers from AIB's, what is CES, a trade show, what do AIB's do at trade shows, show off their custom cards with custom cooling, the 7970's all the AIB's will be showing at CES will all look identical but for a different sticker on the shroud.
By "launching" the 7950 on the eve of CES it means all the AIB's can show off their cards .
I've never known why paper launches are bad. The more information I have the sooner, the better, how could it be worse to know what performance the 7950 has a month before release, rather than on release, how does that make it bad? if you decide the 7950 is worth the wait, it saves you wasting money on something you'll regret, if you decide the 7950 isn't for you, then you've saved a month and can go buy what you want now.