Associate
- Joined
- 4 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 4
- Location
- United Kindom
This is a topic I find most interesting, ever since I sat down and played a short while on Crysis 2 multiplayer and realised that i payed about £30-40 for a single player which I didn't care much about and for a multiplayer that is only mildly amusing for short bursts of time. I personally feel that FPS's should split up single player and multiplayer games for example having a modern warfare game which was an online fps that cost less and didn't come with a pointless single player. Maybe they could have made another game as well that had a thoroughly indepth single player and no half assed and broken multiplayer which had nothing special or interesting about it. The fact is that the FPS gameplay is solid and doesn't need much work its all about the situations you put the player in which makes FPS's interesting. What are your thoughts on this?