Soldato
- Joined
- 31 May 2006
- Posts
- 7,564
- Location
- West London
Just been in conversation with EK regarding a corroded EK supreme HF
And because it was a crimbo 2010 gift I can't RMA it.
Offical Ek product in full retail packing - check
EK product less that 24 months old - check
(I have one of the first oval top ones just over a year ago)
Piece of paper that says this - missing
I checked my bank and PP statments and it must be the only part of my PC I didn't buy myself.
Just typical it's goes wrong.
You'd think that they could make an exception....
After a clean with water an a brush - close ups of the top and bottom
the amendment on corrosion issue was on our own initiative
That makes me laugh - public pressure and massive PR damage due to cost savings more like.
What can I say - ask for money and only buy your own hardware
Anyone know a good way to remove nickel from a block?
And because it was a crimbo 2010 gift I can't RMA it.
Offical Ek product in full retail packing - check
EK product less that 24 months old - check
(I have one of the first oval top ones just over a year ago)
Piece of paper that says this - missing
I checked my bank and PP statments and it must be the only part of my PC I didn't buy myself.
Just typical it's goes wrong.
You'd think that they could make an exception....

After a clean with water an a brush - close ups of the top and bottom


Dear ek Support
I recently removed my ek Supreme from my loop to replace my stock plexi top with an acetal one (oval shape purchased for the ek shop)
Only to find two areas of corrision under the injection plate (see images below and attached)
It has been in my loop since 11th Feb 2011 - as shown by my build log on OcUK - [project] Black & Blue - post 48 ownwards
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18162334
Following the replacement of a MSI board with the faulty intel chip.
Distilled water with a silver kill coil was my coolant
This was given to me as a Christmas present in 2010. So I have no invoice or specific date of purchase.
I still have the full retail packaging and all parts, as well as the replacement top.
EAN no. 3 830046 990204
I request a RMA replacement - but can't fill in the first questions of the standard form.
Please advise on what I/you need to do next, so I can receive a replacement
Kind regards
Stephen Farrell
STA76419.jpg
And after cleaning with water and a toothbrush
coppertop.jpg
copperbot.jpg
Dear customer,
thank you for contacting us.
As much as we would like to help we cannot process any RMA without copy of receipt.
Please provide one. Retailer should be able to send new copy upon demand.
Thank you for understanding.
Best regards, Gregor
Thank you for your reply Gregor
I can completely understand the companies default standpoint.
If I brought it myself I could contact OcUK or any other reseller and get an copy invoice.
But I didn't and the person that did is unable to do so, because she has passed away.
If you will only deal with the actual buyer, I am complete stuffed, what ever I say, post, advertise or blog will make no differance.
If however you are making exceptions on a case by case basis...
My case on why the invoice isn't needed (but I accept would have been helpful) are as follows
Firstly - It's EK retail boxed product! - your the only place that makes them.
I don't want money - I just want a working, fit for purpose replacement - ideally the less expensive copper/Acetal one.
Secondly - the product was launched less that 2 years ago - so MUST be in the 24month RMA period
Date of purchase although helpful in finding which batches were defective doesn't affect the validity of an RMA imho
The EAN number may help, but the EK supreme HF (oval top) was not available for long, before being updated (square top)
Thirdly - the product is over a year old so the e-tailer shouldn't be involved in anyway.
I look forward to your responce.
Kind regards
Stephen Farrell
Dear customer,
the amendment on corrosion issue was on our own initiative.
Generally speaking, people have been running mixed metal loops for some time now without proper treatment and continue to do so despite warnings.
We continue to make public awarness of possible problem backed up with scientificly proved tests.
However we stand firm with our demands for RMA and its processing.
When prerequisitives are a match we process RMA.
Thank you for understanding.
Best regards, Gregor
I understand - just don't think it's right as exceptions can always be made.
+1 unhappy customer
the amendment on corrosion issue was on our own initiative
That makes me laugh - public pressure and massive PR damage due to cost savings more like.
What can I say - ask for money and only buy your own hardware
Anyone know a good way to remove nickel from a block?
Last edited: