The Banter Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Your example wasn't compatible and you know it :p

Not at all. Nobody has the right to tell somebody that they should accept a punishment/decision that they are aggrieved by.

You can disagree with their stance and believe their guilt but not their right to claim their innocence.
 
Not at all. Nobody has the right to tell somebody that they should accept a punishment/decision that they are aggrieved by.

You can disagree with their stance and believe their guilt but not their right to claim their innocence.

They don't even have a consistent bloody story Baz :p they can't feel hard done by when they can't make their mind up about what happened!
 
Do you take back your earlier implication that I was claiming Suarez's innocence?

Consider it rescinded!

Do you also agree that Liverpool shouldn't have handled this situation in the way they have, regardless of their feeling on the matter.
 
They don't even have a consistent bloody story Baz :p they can't feel hard done by when they can't make their mind up about what happened!

As I said, try not to comment on the details of the case because you've shown that you don't know what happened/was in the report.

There were inconsistencies in both Evra and Suarez's version of events.
 
As I said, try not to comment on the details of the case because you've shown that you don't know what happened/was in the report.

There were inconsistencies in both Evra and Suarez's version of events.

Evra had evidence man, all about the evidence.

I also, bow down to your superior knowledge on the small details of this case :p
 
Quote removed

Calling someone a clown is just the equivalent of an idiot/moron/fool etc.

You know that, there's no way to disguise a personal insult :p
 
Consider it rescinded!

Do you also agree that Liverpool shouldn't have handled this situation in the way they have, regardless of their feeling on the matter.

Thank you :p

As for the way Liverpool handled it, that depends on whether I look at it from a Liverpool fans perspective (not in terms of bias) or as a neutral. As a Liverpool fan I'm glad that our club have stuck together and given their unquestionable support for our player. It was only a year or so ago that we had Roy Hodgson failing to defend Torres from unjust criticism from Taggart after the league game at OT.

However I can accept that the club were far too aggressive in their stance. They could have maintained their view without being so provactive. One thing I do dispute though is some people's beleif that they've undermind racism; throughout the case the one thing Liverpool have continued to make clear is that racism and all forms of discrimination is unacceptable.
 
Thank you :p

As for the way Liverpool handled it, that depends on whether I look at it from a Liverpool fans perspective (not in terms of bias) or as a neutral. As a Liverpool fan I'm glad that our club have stuck together and given their unquestionable support for our player. It was only a year or so ago that we had Roy Hodgson failing to defend Torres from unjust criticism from Taggart after the league game at OT.

However I can accept that the club were far too aggressive in their stance. They could have maintained their view without being so provactive. One thing I do dispute though is some people's beleif that they've undermind racism; throughout the case the one thing Liverpool have continued to make clear is that racism and all forms of discrimination is unacceptable.

Wow.

I'm impressed. I got you wrong on this. Apologies if I came as a **** but I thought you were of a similar opinion to Purdycat.

I majorly disagree about undermining racism though ;) as you know.
 
Well I've been saying the same thing (10000 times) ever since it happened :)
Calling someone a clown is just the equivalent of an idiot/moron/fool etc.

You know that, there's no way to disguise a personal insult :p

I know, I wasn't suggesting otherwise. It was just a joke aimed towards Tummy about Rotty not punishing fellow Liverpool fans.
 
However I can accept that the club were far too aggressive in their stance. They could have maintained their view without being so provactive. One thing I do dispute though is some people's beleif that they've undermind racism; throughout the case the one thing Liverpool have continued to make clear is that racism and all forms of discrimination is unacceptable.

I think that is where the problems arise. Its very hard for people to reconcile the two. How can you appear to support someone found guilty of racism whilst denouncing all forms of it.

I wouldn't claim that they have undermined racism as it would take something serious to do that but they need to take a clear cut line on it and I think the one they have taken is a little contradictory.
 
I think that is where the problems arise. Its very hard for people to reconcile the two. How can you appear to support someone found guilty of racism whilst denouncing all forms of it.

I wouldn't claim that they have undermined racism as it would take something serious to do that but they need to take a clear cut line on it and I think the one they have taken is a little contradictory.

I'm not sure that you can't reconcile the two. The problem was that Liverpool's stance on Suarez got more press than their views on racism on the whole.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom