Fat...?

i think we men who appreciate "proper" and "normal" wimmen deserve more pics of this new ann summers bird
 
As long as I can still see my **** and walk under my own power I don't care

Well that's one attitude.

The other is " So long as I don't develop diabetes and am not a eyesore on society I don't care"

:D

(By the way, I am overweight but I am just saying I am shooting for the latter rather than your opinion :))
 
some people genetically have large muscle mass without ever touching weights.

Mike Tyson for example swore he never ever touched weights in his life and was genetically muscular.

Jesus Christ you're so full of it sometimes man. To says he never touched weights is misleading in itself; he still weight trained, just not always with conventional bench/squat/deadlift routines. He once claimed (very different to "swore he never") that he only did dips, press ups, sit ups and shrugs with a barbell. Chances are this was all just smack talk to confuse or wind up his opponents - who'd have thought that from a boxer.

However let's face it, tips, push ups and shrugs are a way of bodybuilding. He wasn't genetically muscly, he simply built up his body. Even if he did do it the way he claimed, that is definitely weight lifting by definition!

This is not a genetic anomaly, it's sheer weight lifting, nutrition and science. Stop preaching your "LULZ GENETICS IS THE BE ALL AND END ALL" BS that is based on no fact and pure Psycho (how apt) Sonny speculation, brah.
 
mike tyson is not an average person neither is any professional sports person.

fact of the matter is, doctors around the world use it to judge peoples weight. If you want to try and pick examples where it doesn't work feel free, but you are fighting a stupid battle lol.

you said it was useless if you are a bodybuilder.

now you are saying it's not useful for anyone who does a sport at a high level.

make your mind up, i was just proving that it's not just stupid for bodybuilders but anyone who intensely works out on a regular basis in a sport where muscle strength is needed.
 
Jesus Christ you're so full of it sometimes man. To says he never touched weights is misleading in itself; he still weight trained, just not always with conventional bench/squat/deadlift routines. He once claimed (very different to "swore he never") that he only did dips, press ups, sit ups and shrugs with a barbell. Chances are this was all just smack talk to confuse or wind up his opponents - who'd have thought that from a boxer.

However let's face it, tips, push ups and shrugs are a way of bodybuilding. He wasn't genetically muscly, he simply built up his body. Even if he did do it the way he claimed, that is definitely weight lifting by definition!

This is not a genetic anomaly, it's sheer weight lifting, nutrition and science. Stop preaching your "LULZ GENETICS IS THE BE ALL AND END ALL" BS that is based on no fact and pure Psycho (how apt) Sonny speculation, brah.

repped.
 
When I was 24 I was about 12.5 stone and very unfit. Now I'm 33, a shade over 14 stone and fit.
 
Jesus Christ you're so full of it sometimes man. To says he never touched weights is misleading in itself; he still weight trained, just not always with conventional bench/squat/deadlift routines. He once claimed (very different to "swore he never") that he only did dips, press ups, sit ups and shrugs with a barbell. Chances are this was all just smack talk to confuse or wind up his opponents - who'd have thought that from a boxer.

However let's face it, tips, push ups and shrugs are a way of bodybuilding. He wasn't genetically muscly, he simply built up his body. Even if he did do it the way he claimed, that is definitely weight lifting by definition!

This is not a genetic anomaly, it's sheer weight lifting, nutrition and science. Stop preaching your "LULZ GENETICS IS THE BE ALL AND END ALL" BS that is based on no fact and pure Psycho (how apt) Sonny speculation, brah.

clearly you have never heard of black genetics then, plz go :o

it's the reason why they excel in so many sports but not swimming, something to do with natural muscle density
 
Well that's one attitude.

The other is " So long as I don't develop diabetes and am not a eyesore on society I don't care"

:D

(By the way, I am overweight but I am just saying I am shooting for the latter rather than your opinion :))

Yeah, your theory is also accepted lol
 
How dairy you patronise me.

Lettuce be cereal, you can claim all the "black genetics lulz" baloney you want mate, he's not got to that size by having a darker shade of skin. He's got to that size by lifting weight; be that his own body weight or the weight of a big round disc on either end of a bar, it was lifting weight none the less.
 
How dairy you patronise me.

Lettuce be cereal, you can claim all the "black genetics lulz" baloney you want mate, he's not got to that size by having a darker shade of skin. He's got to that size by lifting weight; be that his own body weight or the weight of a big round disc on either end of a bar, it was lifting weight none the less.

explain why blacks have big chickens and asians have small ones?

genetics or not?
 
you said it was useless if you are a bodybuilder.

now you are saying it's not useful for anyone who does a sport at a high level.

make your mind up, i was just proving that it's not just stupid for bodybuilders but anyone who intensely works out on a regular basis in a sport where muscle strength is needed.

So you think sports people give two ****s about their BMI? What are you on.
 
explain why blacks have big chickens and asians have small ones?

genetics or not?

Am I debating the differences in genetic make up? No.

Am I debating whether Mike Tyson got tanked up with huge muscles and power from no physical execise, but rather the fact he is black, yes.

I think this is quite apt:
 
So you think sports people give two ****s about their BMI? What are you on.

where did i say that sports people did? i simply said your statement that its useless for bodybuilders only is incorrect.

Am I debating the differences in genetic make up? No.

Am I debating whether Mike Tyson got tanked up with huge muscles and power from no physical execise, but rather the fact he is black, yes.

I think this is quite apt:

so genetics will have played a huge role in the fact he was very strong and muscular? even though he focused on cardio and boxing and not so much on weights. the reason why he was so good is because of training, genetics and natural talent.

he had a huge advantage due to genetics. i never said that he became swole just because he was black. most likely he didnt need to try as hard though because he was black.
 
Genes/genetics play a part in your body size, but the reason fat parents have fat kids isn't just 100% genetics, its because they buy chips for their kids. Simple as that.

Gym rat parents will force their kids to eat healthy or will give their kids a balanced diet and thus will be healthier.

Obviously there are exceptions to the rule
 
Citation needed.

I'm just going to post that whenever you sprout such tosh from now on :)

watch any mike tyson training video, you can clearly see him focusing on skipping mainly, some running and boxing ;)

he may have done weights off camera, but i think everyone knows boxers focus on cardio more than weights.
 
Back
Top Bottom