• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

7770

So you've gone from 180 to 213? Lol, no worries, long day is long in Martinville :p

Anyway, just posted this on the other forum wrt the 7770

Nice twist.
It was available at 180 elsewhere, I was giving the price here on launch, cheapest was 213.
And then it was 199 here a few days after that.
 
I think if you look at the 7770 and see what its replacing (5770/6770) its not to bad at all, its 19% faster and consumes very little power whilst costing roughly the same at launch, now 19% improvement isn't ground breaking for a new gen card but OEM's will suck them up faster than Henry the hover due to them being very quiet, small and the fact they consume very little power.
The situation will look much brighter when you can no longer buy a HD6850/70 on the cheap and when the HD7770 drops in price in a new months.

For now the average user is better off with last gen's tech on the cheap to get the best bang for buck.
 
I think if you look at the 7770 and see what its replacing (5770/6770) its not to bad at all, its 19% faster and consumes very little power whilst costing roughly the same at launch, now 19% improvement isn't ground breaking for a new gen card but OEM's will suck them up faster than Henry the hover due to them being very quiet, small and the fact they consume very little power.
The situation will look much brighter when you can no longer buy a HD6850/70 on the cheap and when the HD7770 drops in price in a new months.

For now the average user is better off with last gen's tech on the cheap to get the best bang for buck.

^ This, the problem is people are comparing launch prices with old EOL GPU's prices, and they're the people who think the desktop GPU industry revolves around them solely.
 
Yep, and will be considerably faster than the 6870 it's replacing, however, the usual derpers will derp.

Nvidia can release the 580 1.5gb for about £450 and no one bats an eyelid, it's just AMD haters, erm hating (and Martin and Alex :p)

AMD haters hating? Over the past four years.

I came back to the UK in 2008 minus a wife. This means - PC porn !

First PC, refurb green Alienware for £280 (a return, basically) everything was fine in it apart from the GPU so I bought a 9800GT.

Then I found out that I paid £150+ for a card that was £130 or so with the name 8800GT. I wasn't best pleased but oh well.

Next card - GTX 280. Went pop, replaced with.

A shiny pair of 5770s.

In the meantime I set up a second PC with two 3870x2s to see if Quadfire was as bad as people said. It was. Infact no, that's too nice, it was worse.

Then I got a GTX 470. Cracking card with a Zalman on !.

Then when it ran short of vram I got a 6970 Lightning.

When that needed RMA I bought a 7970.

So I am no fan boy nor a hater of any company. I do admit I do have a few niggles with Nvidia bubbling away deep down inside me (their rebrands and trickery, and of course their 3DFX bashing that was uncalled for unless you're a greedy corporation !) but I will buy their cards if they meet the correct criteria.

The 7770 does not meet the correct criteria. Infact, if one was to use your argument and calculate how fast a 5770 could go if it could do 1ghz (clock per clock) then you'd probably find that the 5770 was every bit as fast as the 7770.

And I maintain, this is down to AMD. They should have opened more up on the 7770 to clearly set it apart from its predecessors. They haven't, and they're asking too much money for it.

I thought Verdetrol was really funny. I did, it made me laugh loads, just as much as XFX's Power Rangers video. However, if you're going to try and be funny then you need to be clearly funny. When the 7770 released it just made AMD look completely stupid. Kinda like the time they did the videos ripping on Intel and then Intel came along with the Core 2 duo and gave them the biggest pimp slap ever.

That came shortly after AMD's raging success with the Athlon XP series where they gave Intel a poggering. Sadly, as with many other things, they decided to get rather cocky and confident and were dealt numerous crushing pimp slaps.

They've come out and admitted that they can no longer compete at the top end. That's nice, that's honest. Now they are becoming clearly deluded with a minor success*

* I mean the 7970 of course. Had they priced it at £350 or there abouts it would have gone down in history. Not taking away from its prowess of course, but at the price it commands it will never be the stuff of legend.
 
ALX Andy

now thats a damn good point - IF you could get a 5770 to 1ghz , it would be really interesting to see how the 2 compare...
 
ALX Andy

now thats a damn good point - IF you could get a 5770 to 1ghz , it would be really interesting to see how the 2 compare...

Many people did.
The 7770 would still be faster.
I`m still waiting for the launch day £180 6950 you claimed.....

How exactly do you propose I find it? If I remember it was a today only offer at another E-tailor, there won't be an article on it etc.
 
but at stock the 5770 isnt 1 ghz , ergo its an improvement ;)

It's worse IMO.

5770 was 40nm. 7770 is 28nm. It would seem that clock for clock in MHZ they are completely and utterly inseparable.

Which should not happen two years on.

What's going on under the hood should have improved ten fold more than what they've released. A two year old card should not be able to hold a torch in any shape or form to a brand new one running new technology IMO. That's absolutely shameful.
 
well technically it doesnt - the 5770 was not released at 1 ghz by any IHV (happily be proved wrong , fastest was the gigabyte 900 mhz one iirc)

so die shrink meaning 150mhz over the 5770/6770 it does offer better performance
 
Back
Top Bottom