http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-17540508
Looks like a fairly clear cut case and the murderer has been caught/found guilty due to the fact that he was so incredibly stupid...
putting aside the stupidity of murdering two random people for no apparent reason he did so very close to home and was spotted running back into to his home immediately after, then proceeded to brag about what he'd done to several of his friends (who've later testified against him).
Interestingly enough though, given the other high profile Florida shooting in the news, the hate crime aspect hasn't even been mentioned in this case.
An overzealous/trigger happy neighborhood watch member who may/may not have muttered 'coons' on a call to emergency services, then proceeded to confront someone who he deemed suspicious (simply because he was black and wearing a hoodie) and some how ended up shooting him in the confrontation that followed has, quite rightly, generated a fair bit of outrage re: racial profiling and claims that it constituted a hate crime. Not to mention the rather inept local police not pressing charges.
In the above case with these British tourists, (not mentioned on the BBC article) the criminal actually phoned a friend to say that he'd spotted two 'crackers' walking through the housing project and that he was going to rob them. and then proceeded to quite clearly murder them and brag about it.
Given how much fuss is caused by just the possibility of a racial slur having been made in a case where the victim was black (the whole news story isn't so much about the blatantly excessive use of force by the neighborhood watch guy but has turned into one of race) its quite a contrast to see a case where the murderer clearly racially profiled/selected the victims because they were white and used the term 'crackers' to describe them yet the racial/hate crime aspect is never touched upon.
IMO dealing with a problem such as racism isn't helped if some aspects of it are over hyped and others are just completely ignored.
Looks like a fairly clear cut case and the murderer has been caught/found guilty due to the fact that he was so incredibly stupid...
putting aside the stupidity of murdering two random people for no apparent reason he did so very close to home and was spotted running back into to his home immediately after, then proceeded to brag about what he'd done to several of his friends (who've later testified against him).
Interestingly enough though, given the other high profile Florida shooting in the news, the hate crime aspect hasn't even been mentioned in this case.
An overzealous/trigger happy neighborhood watch member who may/may not have muttered 'coons' on a call to emergency services, then proceeded to confront someone who he deemed suspicious (simply because he was black and wearing a hoodie) and some how ended up shooting him in the confrontation that followed has, quite rightly, generated a fair bit of outrage re: racial profiling and claims that it constituted a hate crime. Not to mention the rather inept local police not pressing charges.
In the above case with these British tourists, (not mentioned on the BBC article) the criminal actually phoned a friend to say that he'd spotted two 'crackers' walking through the housing project and that he was going to rob them. and then proceeded to quite clearly murder them and brag about it.
Given how much fuss is caused by just the possibility of a racial slur having been made in a case where the victim was black (the whole news story isn't so much about the blatantly excessive use of force by the neighborhood watch guy but has turned into one of race) its quite a contrast to see a case where the murderer clearly racially profiled/selected the victims because they were white and used the term 'crackers' to describe them yet the racial/hate crime aspect is never touched upon.
IMO dealing with a problem such as racism isn't helped if some aspects of it are over hyped and others are just completely ignored.