That's all feasible but they've said they want it to be huge and even a 'WoW killer' so they'll feel the pressure from the communities who want things changed.
They have never said that. In fact they said quite the opposite.
Does it look better in the flesh?
As in the videos I've seen the graphics look very poor in comparison to Tera
Does it look better in the flesh?
As in the videos I've seen the graphics look very poor in comparison to Tera
The art style is amazing but from last Beta it was a bit hit and miss with some textures looking slightly low res especially in the environment and others such as armour looking great.
nothing is going to kill WoW other than WoW.
Good example take LotRo, can run on any dual core PC fine even runs OK on a a old Intel 3.0ghtz single core PC, but on a high end PC with all the bells and whistles on the game is absolutely stunning, and even tho I am really looking forward to playing GW2, I think the graphics could be a lot better, and may well be (tho doubt it). But the game did not look bad, so will not effect me I guess, I just wish they could make it look at least to the equivalent of a 5 year old game.
Personally LotRo brought back memories of playing my Atari STe. Awful graphics. So bad I stopped playing shortly after starting.
He says directly...
But then says he want's to beat WoW. Contradicting himself I guess :/
Personally LotRo brought back memories of playing my Atari STe. Awful graphics. So bad I stopped playing shortly after starting.
wow really and I mean the term wow is in OMG (yeh i got to use the word omg), since when does beating = killing well not in my universe, so unless the 2 words mean something different in yours there is no contradictions what so ever
![]()