No it doesn't. I'll post the answers in a couple of weeks as I stated in the OP![]()
Ugh, all that and I don't get to find out how many I got right. I shall have to find my reward elsewhere.

Hmmph.
No it doesn't. I'll post the answers in a couple of weeks as I stated in the OP![]()
I think if you need to qualify the word police you're not - that was my thinking anyway.
If they indeed are not police then how on earth can they be not impersonating...
no, years and years ago they used to be actual constables but was later removed, some are employed by local councils but arnt actuall police
http://www.ukemergency.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=46&Itemid=80
I found that some of the images made it impossible to make out whether the person was an officer or not......this was an inherent problem with the image itself rather than identifying the person in uniform as being a Police Officer.
I found that some of the images made it impossible to make out whether the person was an officer or not......this was an inherent problem with the image itself rather than identifying the person in uniform as being a Police Officer.
As long as the 'Special' is considered a copper then I'll be OK lol. I'll be interested in the results.
TBH.. if I was just watching someone being tackled, I might not recognise police officers or not.
Just a point here Burnsy - the fact that the people doing this test know what it is means they're more likely to think a bit harder/second guess themselves where they wouldn't normally in an everyday situation. To get a true representation of whether people identify the non-police security staff as real police you would need to make a survey with multiple types of emergency service personnel and give the relevant options for each.
You may well have thought of this already!