You need to claim the dysfunctional penile rebate for £34,995 a year.
I think the Gov form code is PD01
.Unemployed bussed in to steward jubilee, unpaid and asked to sleep rough
- Thread starter Pav89
- Start date
You need to claim the dysfunctional penile rebate for £34,995 a year.
I think the Gov form code is PD01
.
Where do you work? When you say "we didn't renew" you really mean that your boss didn't renew, or did you have some say in the hiring and firing of staff?
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Apr 2007
- Posts
- 6,633
You need to claim the dysfunctional penile rebate for £34,995 a year.
I think the Gov form code is PD01
AAHAHAHAHAH!!
Sweet, payday for me.
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Aug 2006
- Posts
- 11,428
- Location
- Derbyshire
I had zero input into it but this is what the senior members of the department who did said afterwards. It was 50/50 boss and a senior member who decided.
why are you laughing!
http://www.polishforums.com/archive...-towards-polish-immigration-uk-becoming-6435/
And that was from 2007
Associate
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 2,282
- Location
- Rainham, Kent
Some of the young Tory Boys on here really are in for a shock later in their lives if things don't go perfectly smoothly - it only takes divorce, unemployment or health problems for your life to turn upside down and suddenly find yourself becoming a 'benefit scrounger'.
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Aug 2006
- Posts
- 11,428
- Location
- Derbyshire
There is a massive difference between bad health and just can't be bothered.
Why all the Tory assumptions too? I have never once on these forums discussed polical voting.
Associate
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 2,382
- Location
- Darwen
You are making assumptions that people who don't have jobs just 'cant be bothered', works both ways.
They're being paid to look for work - I don't have an issue with someone being told/asked to do some work temporarily as part of their benefits if, after a period of time, they've been unable to find work off their own back.
yet again the forced work programmes for those on benefits fails, all it is, is companies getting free labour from the unemployed in return for donations to the tory party
can't wait for this to end up in court, the human rights act bans slavery
its all well and good giving people RELEVANT experience, but what the hell does this give them
can't wait for this to end up in court, the human rights act bans slavery
its all well and good giving people RELEVANT experience, but what the hell does this give them
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Aug 2006
- Posts
- 11,428
- Location
- Derbyshire
I only talk of experience of people I have met in real life. Many many people seem to live a reasonable life without lifting a finger.
I feel almost all of the issue is with people giving up and taking the 'there is nothing out there' approach, rather than 'I will find work very soon' view.
Anyway, I am off to relax for a bit, as some of us have work in the morning
.
Associate
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 2,382
- Location
- Darwen
Why though?
If there is enough work to make them do 30 hour weeks for up to 2 years like the Work Programme then give them the full time paid job?
Its just forced free labour for big corporations, why take on staff when you can use the unlimited rotating roster of unemployed people.
For each person you talk to that don't want to lift a finger there will be another person who tries their hardest to find a job and tarring everyone with the same brush just makes people give up. If people are treated like scum because of the stigma of benefits then why bother looking for work, if people treat you like that you might as well act like it.
Which is called denial and is a dangerous road in itself, which would lead to more psychopaths that we have now. /assumption.
What would you tell someone who say looked for a job for 20 years with that attitude and still has not got one, his prospects are getting lower each time, especially due to ageism?
He would eventually crack at some point, probably ending his life. /assumption.
Being required to work long hours unpaid is repugnant totally irrespective of government paid benefits. As before, nobody should be put in the position whereby they expected to work like that merely to be 'considered' for a job. It's pure exploitation on behalf of the 'employer', the fact that those working might be on an unemployment benefit is irrelevant in my eyes.
I don't care who made the decision, the point is that you didn't despite trying to imply that you did and look like a big shot on here.
I think a good way to get people back into work (low paid jobs) would be to give a 1 year tax break up to 15k for those who've been LT unemployed for over a year. Then obviously dropping back to 747L or something.
Gives a good chance for people to get back on the horse and make the money go further.
Gives a good chance for people to get back on the horse and make the money go further.
Quite... people from other countries will travel over here in search of work and will often find it. Lots of people in the UK wouldn't likely even consider moving 100 miles... to quote Norman Tebbit 'get on your bike'
Training for crowd control at a Diamond Jubliee, you know they come around every blue moon
Associate
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 2,382
- Location
- Darwen
Easy if you have no ties or responsibilities.
What if you have a wife and kid(s), do you all move into a hostel just to please your ridiculous suggestions?
What about people like me who struggled to find a job but was caring for my grandmother, should I have just left her to fend for herself and move just so the thick halfwits who 'pay my benefits' would be pleased?
Agreed.