William and kate on honeymoon

jsmoke said:
Will still damage their long term credibility though.
Click to expand...

Untrue. People will say it's damaged it, but the same people will still buy the thing.

If you buy it, you're paying for it to happen. I don't know why it's deemed unacceptable to have a go at someone if you see them with it. As in "What did you buy that for? You're paying for their privacy to be invaded you scumbag."
 
MrMoonX said:
and to think we paid for their wedding and are now having to pay for "security" while they enjoy a nice holiday.
Click to expand...

Even though I have you on ignore it still shows that you posted, so sometimes I unhide a post just to see what I'm missing.

Turns out I'm not missing anything.
 
Greebo said:
Not really. The agreement with the Royals is with the British press, they can't have an argeement with the press everywhere in the world.

And it is expected that it was just a local/holiday maker who took the pics and then cashed in later as opposed to a professional photographer.
Click to expand...

It won't be the photographer who gets in trouble, it'll be the publishers. And the security will probably get a telling off aswell :p
 
The Halk said:
Even though I have you on ignore it still shows that you posted, so sometimes I unhide a post just to see what I'm missing.

Turns out I'm not missing anything.
Click to expand...

likewise ;) least I don't have to look at your ugly sig, and in any case your only bitter as you know I'm right
 
I don't believe any photo that such magazines print due to how much photoshoppery goes on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom