Hello
Just wanted to ask why the hell EA have started to make people pay for access to multiplayer and why are the servers so **** even though you now must pay!
Prime example is Battlefield 3, if you buy this game second hand (most people do for multiplayer) you have to pay for access to multiplayer, but the servers are laggy and sometimes you can't even find a game. Not only this but they have introduced rent a server that means you can play but you might get kicked by the host for killing him 6 times in a row because he's not very good, and theres no other alternative as they havent put up general servers for everyone else.
When you think about all this it looks like EA are just cashing in, yes we want to play your game, we have bought it 2nd hand but don't want t pay you extra for access to multiplayer... we bought the game ... all of it, not just half.
I really don't understand why there isn't a lawsuit going on, when a company sells a game, you buy what it advertises on the box even if its second hand it should still apply...
I bought BF3 brand new and so don't have the problem but i sold it when they started selling servers and i couldent get a match without someone kicking me because i beat them or with some stupid rules.
What do you guys think ? Is this EA cashing in on thier grip on the market or do you think us gamers should pay extra for something the game advertises on the box...
Just wanted to ask why the hell EA have started to make people pay for access to multiplayer and why are the servers so **** even though you now must pay!
Prime example is Battlefield 3, if you buy this game second hand (most people do for multiplayer) you have to pay for access to multiplayer, but the servers are laggy and sometimes you can't even find a game. Not only this but they have introduced rent a server that means you can play but you might get kicked by the host for killing him 6 times in a row because he's not very good, and theres no other alternative as they havent put up general servers for everyone else.
When you think about all this it looks like EA are just cashing in, yes we want to play your game, we have bought it 2nd hand but don't want t pay you extra for access to multiplayer... we bought the game ... all of it, not just half.
I really don't understand why there isn't a lawsuit going on, when a company sells a game, you buy what it advertises on the box even if its second hand it should still apply...
I bought BF3 brand new and so don't have the problem but i sold it when they started selling servers and i couldent get a match without someone kicking me because i beat them or with some stupid rules.
What do you guys think ? Is this EA cashing in on thier grip on the market or do you think us gamers should pay extra for something the game advertises on the box...