Astrology And Other Pseudoscientific Beliefs

Associate
Joined
26 Jun 2007
Posts
139
Location
London
How many of you know someone or believe yourself in what would be considered by the majority to be pseudoscientific concepts?

Astrology seems to be the most 'mainstream' as horoscopes are in many newspapers and magazines. People may end up taking them seriously even though there is no scientific evidence whatsoever to backup what Astrology claims.

I'm a total non-believer of pseudoscience although i can understand why people are attracted to it if they don't know any better. (sorry i don't mean to come across as arrogant here but many of these concepts have been debunked by science or the facts can't be proved by any modern scientific method)

Critical thinking by your average Joe is harder nowadays especially when there's so many junk pseudoscience online, some of it very well written and convincing.

My mum - she believes in clairvoyants/psychics/mediums, ESP, 'auras' around people,crystal and energy healing etc etc. She calls me 'ignorant' for my lack of 'knowledge' in these 'fields'. It's frustrating!

To balance the argument out, spirits and life after death can never be disproved as science is still primitive involving the human mind, how the brain works and consciousness.
Although i'm mostly an atheist, God also cannot be disproved. (please DON'T let this be a discussion about religion!) Same with UFOs, alien life could be out there but most unlikely to be visiting our skies!

It's hard to write a post like this, i'm bound to upset someone but as science has progressed SO MUCH in the last few decades it seems the misinformation that has appeared on the internet over the last 5 - 10 years has increased massively.:eek:
My mum has the internet to 'back up' all her claims, no doubt the sources are not credible in the slightest!
 
They are no more ridiculous than the beliefs held by those who associate with mainstream religion. They are as deluded as eachother.
 
Yes i feel pseudoscientific claims and mainstream religion were relevant a few hundred years ago when our understanding of the nature of the world & universe was limited.
Science has progressed so far in the last 50 years that most people should not believe in these pseudoscientific beliefs. (science education was taught in schools even in my mum's era)

Science backs up atheism, the theory of evolution cannot ever be compatible with the concept of god. (though they try and make intelligent design compatible)
Even (accelerating) computation and information theory can be explained by evolution, Stephen Wolfram's work on Cellular Automa and Ray Kurzweil's prediction on the Singularity are good examples here.

Are there any scientists that are religous too?
 
Yes i feel pseudoscientific claims and mainstream religion were relevant a few hundred years ago when our understanding of the nature of the world & universe was limited.
Science has progressed so far in the last 50 years that most people should not believe in these pseudoscientific beliefs. (science education was taught in schools even in my mum's era)

Science backs up atheism, the theory of evolution cannot ever be compatible with the concept of god. (though they try and make intelligent design compatible)
Even (accelerating) computation and information theory can be explained by evolution, Stephen Wolfram's work on Cellular Automa and Ray Kurzweil's prediction on the Singularity are good examples here.

Are there any scientists that are religous too?

There are some scientists who are religious, but they are deluded themselves. Many who would might be labelled as religious are actually deists, rather than theists (i.e. The Universe is created, but there isn't a god who intervenes in your life, there's no 'personal god').

Religion and Science are incompatible, but what you generally get is Religion, trying to make Science fit and say "well, look, you see, maybe they meant that".
 
Religion and Science are incompatible, but what you generally get is Religion, trying to make Science fit and say "well, look, you see, maybe they meant that".

Quit, few people believe in the Adam & Eve story nowadays but they'll cling to the belief that God pushed evolution a long citing the stories in Genesis as 'metaphors'.

Which is stupid because the Adam and Eve tail is rubbish as an analogy for evolution. If the 'talking snake' had an offpring that was a crocodile who in turn gave birth to a lion, who in turn gave birth to a meerkat, who gave birth to a monkey who gave birth to a human the metaphor excuse might have some weight to it.

I always find watching this video amusing

 
Last edited:
My girlfriend's workplace recently had a shaman come in to drive away evil spirits. A middle-aged, female, white shaman. :confused::(

Apparently she was pretty quiet, hummed in a room for about 10 minutes, told them they could no longer open the supply cupboard (heh) and then buggered off.
 
I work in retail and my best mornings are when magazines like Spirit And Destiny come out. I find myself absolutely crease up reading the front covers. One of the funnier headlines stated "9/11 Ghost became my lover". I refer to these types of magazines as literature of the mentally ill. :D

Russell Grant should be should be hung from a lamppost too.
 
Last edited:
I suspect a huge percent of people are neurologically incapable of scientific/logical/rational/critical thought. Their brain is simply not wired for it and no amount of education can help them. They might believe in science but they don't understand it, it's just another type of magic.

Most people simply believe in magic.
 
I suspect a huge percent of people are neurologically incapable of scientific/logical/rational/critical thought. Their brain is simply not wired for it and no amount of education can help them. They might believe in science but they don't understand it, it's just another type of magic.

Most people simply believe in magic.


Kwerk, no one asked for your opinion.

Go back to your cage. :mad:

:D
 
No, although don't ask me why it's said 'hung' in the method of being 'hung, drawn and quartered'.

Edit: Best theory I've heard is if you are taken down alive like in the above method it is 'hung' but if you are killed you have been 'hanged'.
 
Last edited:
There would seem to be a reasonable number of paranormal experiences that defy explanation, so I conclude that we either don't fully understand how the brain works or there is some force that can move a chair around a room and turn on a tap.

I fully believe in UFO's yet the poverty of evidence is much the same, I just want to believe.
It would therefore be hypocritical to dismiss other beliefs that have little solid evidence.

I think there is a contradiction that people feel they must dismiss things they don't understand because they want to seen as intelligent, whereas a scientist would just want to see more data.
 
I fully believe in UFO's yet the poverty of evidence is much the same, I just want to believe.

yesitis2.gif



Yes, I wish him to be killed. Hanged it is! :D

I concur :D
 
Back
Top Bottom