You do know of which hammer I speak?
What law are you basing this on? So what part of the fraud act, basically.
It feels like I've just eaten a lot of ice cream and have brain freeze from reading this thread.
edit: already answred.What law are you basing this on? So what part of the fraud act, basically.
Where's the gain or loss, if it's merely a credit facility, though? It'd seem dubious for potential interest to count.
Where's the gain or loss, if it's merely a credit facility, though? It'd seem dubious for potential interest to count.
As a current or recent student (I can't remember when you started) are you concerned about your multiple 0% overdrafts?Where's the gain or loss, if it's merely a credit facility, though? It'd seem dubious for potential interest to count.
Where's the gain or loss, if it's merely a credit facility, though? It'd seem dubious for potential interest to count.
I'm just not convinced it'd count as a gain... obviously it's literally a loss or gain, but for the purposes of the act, I mean. It 'sounds wrong' (lol) for want of a better expression. Potential interest can't count as money or property, so the opening of an account merely breaches the terms and conditions, rather than counting as fraud. The the lost interest would be absolutely minuscule, realistically speaking, etc.
Not that any of this actually matters, as all that will ever happen is the bank'll remove your overdraft facility.
Think of it as loss of income for the bank, rather than loss of interest. Given that students generally have non-existent credit ratings, they'd be looking at credit cards around the 20-30% APR mark. (Granite, Aqua, those *******s)
When you're talking up to a £3,000 overdraft facility, that's a lot of potential income for the bank that is lost if the account holder withholds information.