...some of his friends met up with him and told him that his maths teacher told the credit class that he only got a 3/4 which was why he wasn't in that credit class now.
Exam results, when I was in school and on my undergrad course, were pasted to the wall. Don't see the issue.
Would you have started this thread if he was in the smarter class, and the teacher told the students in the lower class he got moved up because he got a 2? No you would not.
People only tend to get moved down a set for poor results. If the teacher was to say "personal reasons" or just not comment at all then it would only fuel rumour. If he had said, "What a thicko! He only got a 3!" then I would object, but if it was merely a statement of fact then I don't see a problem. It also serves as a reminder to kids who are in a similar situation, but perhaps scraped through, that they can't be lax.
It's a valuable life lesson that your son has learned. Doing worse than you expected happens to all of us every now and again. I did worse than I expected in my first set of A Level maths exams. I was devastated at the time but it was probably the best thing that could happen to me as I'd never really screwed up anything before. I sorted myself out, got an A in Maths, an A in Further Maths, an A in Physics and I went on to get a first at university reading Maths. He can turn it around if he wants to and it's better to get a kick in the backside while there's time to do something about it.
For the love of god, quote people properly!
Should have tried harder if he wanted to hang with the smart kids.
Seriously, you shouldn't be encouraging his victim complex, it's his fault he didn't make the grade, what was he going to do, make up stories to his friends why he wasn't in that class anymore? Is lying to your friends better than accepting the truth?
It's a valuable life lesson that your son has learned. Doing worse than you expected happens to all of us every now and again. I did worse than I expected in my first set of A Level maths exams. I was devastated at the time but it was probably the best thing that could happen to me as I'd never really screwed up anything before. I sorted myself out, got an A in Maths, an A in Further Maths, an A in Physics and I went on to get a first at university reading Maths. He can turn it around if he wants to and it's better to get a kick in the backside while there's time to do something about it.
Hmm, I find it strange that he would get dropped down a tier because of a single exam result. He essentially worked in the advanced class all year, I imagine his class work was up to standard? then he messed up the exam, so they drop him to a class where he'll be less challenged?? I would have expected the people in charge to weigh up his classwork before dropping him, rather than the results of a single examination
OP, address my point on the previous page. The scenario as you've explained it isn't possible.
It is depending on the school and its size.
We had several math classes in our year, two credit two general one foundy. Same with History, I achieved a 1 for history but was actually in the Gen/Cred not the Cred/Gen class. When moving onto higher history for example I was in what would be considered the lower class, as the pupil composition did not change moving the two classes up into higher.
You get me? Same course, but still what could be considered two sets of 'credit' and 'credit/general' aptitudes.
Perhaps he just got confusesd with terminology if it is something like this.
But you don't have a credit/general paper in a Higher class. Everyone sits exactly the same exam and are taught the same thing so I don't understand why you would have a lower ability class for the same exam.
But you don't have a credit/general paper in a Higher class. Everyone sits exactly the same exam and are taught the same thing so I don't understand why you would have a lower ability class for the same exam.