Sleeping Dogs performance

[psychodil]

Turn off vsync for a start, you don't bench with vsync. Try the latest beta drivers and see if it helps, I'm sure it will.

 

[Rusty0611]

FantasticCG - you need to first of all grab the latest beta's and then you need to change a value using nVidia inspector to get SLI to work properly.

Both of cards were stressed properly for me but SLI didn't actually make any difference to my score due to an incorrect value in the SLI profile. Read this:

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?p=33851759

 

[fantasticCG]

can you post the link for it please dont think i downloaded it right

 

[Rusty0611]

680 SLI:

 

[Rusty0611]

can you post the link for it please dont think i downloaded it right

http://downloads.guru3d.com/downloadget.php?id=2612&file=6&evp=ba62db7eeaba59106a67c513e8018e68

 

[Tonester0011]

Rusty, i'll post single and CF with only high AA.
Will post here in a bit.

 

[fantasticCG]

downloaded it all i get is a little square box with gpu info
and 2 drop down box's at the bottom.
One for the cards and one saying overclocking.
where do you change???

 

[fantasticCG]

 

[fantasticCG]

scrap that found it. The profile settings do i need to select sleeping dogs
or can i change the values on the first screen?

 

[Rusty0611]

Rusty, i'll post single and CF with only high AA.
Will post here in a bit.

Cool mate - thanks.

Here's mine:

680 (AA high):

680 SLI (AA high):

The SLI profile isn't scaling very well so hopefully nVidia can resolve in a future driver delivery.

 

[Rusty0611]

scrap that found it. The profile settings do i need to select sleeping dogs
or can i change the values on the first screen?

Select Sleeping Dogs in the game list and change the value shown on that Anandtech link I pasted to you mate.

 

[fantasticCG]

Also look at the MB on the second gpu its off the chart.
I know its a glitch as it came up in darksiders2 but i forgotten how to get rid of it?

 

[Tonester0011]

Scaling seems to be pants for only high AA.
CF @1125/1575
Single @1200/1575

 

[Rusty0611]

*snip*
Scaling seems to be pants for only high AA.
CF @1125/1575
Single @1200/1575

Interesting that you're also getting rubbish scaling.

Looks like 680's are slightly faster with AA on high but get comparatively crippled by Extreme AA.

Although my 680's are pretty decent so need more data to firm up that conclusion!

 

[Tonester0011]

Interesting that you're also getting rubbish scaling.

Looks like 680's are slightly faster with AA on high but get comparatively crippled by Extreme AA.

Although my 680's are pretty decent so need more data to firm up that conclusion!

I was getting 40% on both my cards on the highway scene. On Extreme AA for comparison, i was getting high 90% pretty much the whole way through.

Our averages and highs were near enough identical for the single card, but on SLI/CF you win by a large margin...possibly down to better clocking cards, mine just dont clock in CF.

 

[fantasticCG]

Ill test on my benq now and post

 

[Rusty0611]

I was getting 40% on both my cards on the highway scene. On Extreme AA for comparison, i was getting high 90% pretty much the whole way through.

Our averages and highs were near enough identical for the single card, but on SLI/CF you win by a large margin...possibly down to better clocking cards, mine just dont clock in CF.

Yeah perhaps... Mine were both 1275/+475 on the memory.

Slightly faster on single card was probably a stretch - you're right they're almost identical.

 

[LtMatt]

I apologise for all true graphic whores for what I'm about to say.

I just ran High, albeit at the request of Rusty.

Rusty, here are my results using my 24/7 overclock of 1200 core 1575 memory.

Extreme & High




Temps are slightly higher than normal, 27c in norwich today. Bloody boiling.

 

[Tonester0011]

Why is there such a large difference in your minimum fps lads when you have the same card?

Resolution

 

[LtMatt]

Resolution

Haha, silly me.

I will now edit my post to avoid any further embarrassment or heckling.