There aren't any grey areas...if you carefully avoid thinking. As for your bizarre assertion that she is totally mindless, literally as mindless as an inanimate object, that's such a weird thing to believe that I question your sanity.
On the basis of your posts, I conclude that you are much less able to make decisions than she is.
You can rationally argue that you think that her decisions are of no importance, but you can't rationally argue that she can't make any decisions. That would only be true if she was literally as mindless as an inanimate object.
Who benefits from this? To me, that's the key question. You may claim she does, but that's not true. Besides, even if you believed it, why would you care about someone you treat with such extreme contempt that you dismiss them as being a mindless object?
No grey areas my arse. It would be easy to pretend that there aren't and to some extent a functioning legal system needs to ignore them in favour of the obvious fiction of a fixed age of consent, but in reality there are big grey areas. Not only do you ignore them, you go a step further and pretend that everyone is utterly, totally mindless until they suddenly spontaneously develop a mind at whatever fairly arbitrary age the local legal system assigns. That's not reality.
Last edited:
