Windows 8 The Verdicts ?

I must admit, now that I've spent a few hours today just playing and getting to know Win 8, I'm quite enjoying the new look and feel of it, granted there are some things that could be better implemented & some more advanced options made available, especially for desktop power users but in general I like it (I did think I'd hate it from just watching YouTube vids initially).

Certainly worth the upgrade fee :)
 
I've put 8 on my netbook to try it out and I'm not sure I like it. I'm not keen on the way it behaves like two completely separate OS's depending if you're on the desktop or the modern UI. I also don't like the way modern UI works with a mouse or trackpad. I'm sure it's great on a tablet where you get a good touch screen OS, with a full power version of Windows built in to it. I think I'll stick with 7 on my desktop for a while yet though.
 
okay just put it on pc

installed quick and easy not a issue clean install

people sid issues with steam istalled no problem on it now

people said issues with creative drivers . installed working properly :p

seems very fast and slick .
 
Installed yesterday, wasn't without its issues tho. My display drivers wouldn't install 12.11 am thinking this might because there beta tho.
Then Windows apps wouldn't open in the end it was my Avast anti-virus software was out of date.
So after all that I can now start to enjoy this OS.
 
3 days now and my opinion is:-

It's okay, but not worth upgrading from Win7 for unless you already have a touchscreen.

Here are some comments regarding the main perceived benefits of Win8.
*More efficient memory usage - memory is dirt cheap.
*Faster startup time - not by much when comparing fresh installs for both Win7 and Win8.
*Better security - for how long? Vista was secure than XP, Win7 more secure than Vista, yet they each needed hundreds of security fixes. Win8 will be no different.
*Easier to understand UI - debatable.

In my opninion, the biggest selling factor for Win8 is it's cheapness when purchased as an upgrade version. However, I have only bothered to upgrade my Vista machine, because Win7 still feels plent good enough.
 
3 days now and my opinion is:-

It's okay, but not worth upgrading from Win7 for unless you already have a touchscreen.

Here are some comments regarding the main perceived benefits of Win8.
*More efficient memory usage - memory is dirt cheap.
*Faster startup time - not by much when comparing fresh installs for both Win7 and Win8.
*Better security - for how long? Vista was secure than XP, Win7 more secure than Vista, yet they each needed hundreds of security fixes. Win8 will be no different.
*Easier to understand UI - debatable.

In my opninion, the biggest selling factor for Win8 is it's cheapness when purchased as an upgrade version. However, I have only bothered to upgrade my Vista machine, because Win7 still feels plent good enough.

I rather think you opinion is odd when you consider the good point you make about Windows 8. Actually, when the 'Metro' start screen is configured to one's needs, it is faster to use than the old start menu so use is actually better. When you add the other improvements Microsoft has made, it seems like Windows 8 is a bargain, at least for now.

Sure, one can carry on with older versions of Windows for years, (look at XP), but, frankly, the latest edition is usually the safest. It is also going to be the best maintained, at least while it is the current edition. Of course there will be loads of security updates as Microsoft fights those who would like to hack into people's computers but at least Windows 8 applies these without asking and taking up our time doing it.

Sorry, but I can't see any reason why one would not upgrade at the current, silly upgrade price.
 
Every time i try to use it on my main PC i get frustrated and reboot into W7.

It just bugs me that this OS is clearly not for desktop PCs. I want to be able to browse my PC normally, with ease with one hand at my leisure. I don't want to have keep pressing keys all the time to do shortcuts into menus etc and to shut down.
With 3 screens i don't see why it can't be as as easy as W7 to have multiple windows open, webpages, spreadsheets at once.

It just seems to be that W8 GUI was made for WP, Surface and netbook/laptop to bring them together.
But for a desktop enthusiast, it's just backwards. Give me the standard desktop with explorer, taskbar and small out-of-my-face start menu for my main massive desktop PC. I'll keep W8 for my little laptop i use for browsing, facebook, email and maybe some light office work.
 
I'm pretty tempted with this. The thing I was a little curious about though was, is windows 8 'our' new OS?Or is this more aimed at tablets, but is also able to run on pc's? Like will we be seeing windows 9 next year that's more for desktops?
 
I'm pretty tempted with this. The thing I was a little curious about though was, is windows 8 'our' new OS?Or is this more aimed at tablets, but is also able to run on pc's? Like will we be seeing windows 9 next year that's more for desktops?

This is Microsoft's best guess at a solution for all devices, unless there's a massive backlash (and it doesn't appear that way so far) expect the next version of Windows to be a refinement on what you see in 8.
 
I'm pretty tempted with this. The thing I was a little curious about though was, is windows 8 'our' new OS?Or is this more aimed at tablets, but is also able to run on pc's? Like will we be seeing windows 9 next year that's more for desktops?

Ignore what some people say it's a multi platform OS like said above.
W9 will be based on it and metro will be even more utilized than it is now.
Metro is absolutely fine on a desktop with k&m as well. Especially since they added the mouse wheel to scroll.

It will frustrate everyone to begin with, but you can quickly adapt to it and like the benefits.
 
Ignore what some people say it's a multi platform OS like said above.
W9 will be based on it and metro will be even more utilized than it is now.
Metro is absolutely fine on a desktop with k&m as well. Especially since they added the mouse wheel to scroll.

It will frustrate everyone to begin with, but you can quickly adapt to it and like the benefits.

Indeed, I think it’s a big change but people will soon get used to it and eventually it will seem quite normal. A point somebody made elsewhere was look at the fuss with Office 2007 when they dumped the old menu for the ribbon, lots of moaning but now everyone likes it, not quite the same I know but a reasonable example.

At the end of the day anyone walking into the shop and buying a PC or laptop will have this, it’s not like it’s down to everyone making a choice of whether to upgrade.
 
Installed it Saturday and can't get on with the Start Screen, I think it's an awful idea for a desktop OS and far too disjointed to the rest of the underlying OS. Tablets yes, keyboard and mouse no.

However, with something like Start8 and a full desktop environment, I like it, even it if does only feel like a refined Windows 7.

I still can't get backup to work correctly though, I thought it would be sorted but it seems they just did a straight port of the Windows 7 feature (and called it the same as well bizarrely).
 
I like the faster startup but since its secretly just a resume from hibernate then Win 7 gives the same result in end.

I cant stand the child friendy Start Screen that replaces none of the features of the start menu thats been removed. No recent apps list, no recent documents lists for those apps, no 2 clicks from anywhre in pc now its all scroll or type search for options now. No advanced search, no right click or drag and drop stuff onto this new Start Screen... ********.

Metro is also promoted as an "Ad serving platform" and Its already showing with how Adware looking its become since launch. Adverts on Live tiles and on almost every page of downloaded apps spamming away and burning thru more bandwidth. Now M$ earns revenue from every time u use this Start screen and will only get worse when all the video and audio spamming adverts appear thats been previewed already.

Win 7 is the next Xp as it will be the last Os from M$ that isnt forcing you into a walled garden full of adware spam at every turn.
 
Ignore what some people say it's a multi platform OS like said above.
W9 will be based on it and metro will be even more utilized than it is now.
Metro is absolutely fine on a desktop with k&m as well. Especially since they added the mouse wheel to scroll.

It will frustrate everyone to begin with, but you can quickly adapt to it and like the benefits.

Excellent, cheers Glaucus and Deathstorm. I always like to learn new things and well, 8 looks lovely. the only time i click on my start button is to either go to my computer or shut down. so im not fussed.

If i remember rightly, this is usually the case. People are afraid of change. I think the only time people were happy with a new OS was when Vista went to 7. I remember a lot of my friends complaining when XP first came out.
 
http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/30/windows-8-review/

Though you could install Windows 8 on an older Win 7 system and use it solely with a mouse and keyboard, the market is filling up with touch-friendly PCs designed to be used with Win 8. These include traditional notebooks with touchscreens, as well as dockable tablets, all-in-ones with articulating displays, slider PCs and convertible laptops whose screens can twist and fold back into tablet mode. In general, we'd strongly recommend any of these over a PC that doesn't have a touchscreen.

What we've learned -- and what we couldn't fully appreciate before testing some of these new devices -- is that Windows 8 is at its best when you have the option of interacting with it using your fingers. It doesn't matter so much if you have a touchscreen, a modern touchpad or an external trackpad that supports Win 8 gestures. The point is, many of Windows 8's most enchanting features (the Charms Bar, etc.) are easy to use this way, but frustrating if all you have to work with is a mouse. If you have an older system whose touchpad won't support Windows 8 gestures, you might want to stick with Win 7 until you're ready to buy a new PC -- without that touch input, many of those new features will be lost on you. For people with more touch-friendly hardware, though, Windows 8 is easier to use than you may have feared. Its tablet-style apps, multitasking features and desktop enhancements add up to a balanced mix. It's an OS you can use seamlessly on a tablet, but with features like Snap, Switcher and File Explorer you might well be more productive than you ever were on an iPad or Android slate. Just don't lose faith as you're climbing your way across that learning curve.
 
Well i must admit, i'm coming around to W8.

Been using it for nearly a week now, starting with the Release Candidate, and now onto full Win8 Pro, and it's definatly growing on me.

The differences between the RC and the live W8 are subtle, but ALL have been beneficial. Where i was tripping up trying to do things before, now there is a button. The setup was a lot smoother.

My only complaint so far, which i have rectified was that, as it's tablet aimed, the default power saving features are rather aggressive. By default it shuts down the HDDs after just 20 minutes.

I left it running today ripping a particularly tricky CD with Exact Audio Copy. When i came home from work i found it had switched itself off. Upon hitting the power button it came back to life and did what looked like a full boot, and after logging back in it continued where it had left off (around 65%).

So basically despite HDD and Optical Drive (and CPU) activity, becuase there had been no 'input' for a few hours, it went to sleep, stopping the process i had intentionally left on.

Will run a test tonight to see if it remains on overnight.
 
I'm getting on fine with it but only because you can set it up to completely avoid the metro apps. I just deleted them all, replacing with the better desktop versions where I wanted the them (internet explorer, control panel etc).

Make no mistake, the metro ui is horrible on desktop/laptop & completely unsuited to serious work but it is completely avoidable.
I have no problems with using the start screen as a replacement for the start menu, its about equally functional.

Onto the good, file pause & resume long overdue, file history is a great feature, the more minimalist styling is nice if unimportant, the price is good.

In summary, it is actually a slightly better desktop OS but a pity I had to spend 1/2 an hour removing the unwanted tablet crap that should never have been there.

If, in the future, Microsoft want to remove the desktop paradigm, I will be parting ways with windows, which I don't relish because I don't like either of the alternatives half as much.
 
Back
Top Bottom