Permabanned
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 35,711
^^ lolgenious
I have worked at their premises for 3 years. They don't pay me directly but i work for them as much as anyone else here.
I just think these out sourced contracts should stipulate that on site staff that are permanent and have been there for a say 2 years should have some of the benefits the internal staff get.
I just think these out sourced contracts should stipulate that on site staff that are permanent and have been there for a say 2 years should have some of the benefits the internal staff get.
I have worked at their premises for 3 years. They don't pay me directly but i work for them as much as anyone else here.
Why don't you ask this company to employ you permanently? that is the only way you will get the benefits that they offer
No i am against unions.
Basically I work for an IT company that has various clients and with the IT company we don't get any benefits what so ever but the law firms that we are permanently based at have a long list of benefits.
Is anyone out sourced or contracted or temp or basically non permanently employee of a company, but yet you work internal to the company and are permanently based there ?
Basically I work for an IT company that has various clients and with the IT company we don't get any benefits what so ever but the law firms that we are permanently based at have a long list of benefits.
private healthcare
gym membership
full pension
bonus
share scheme
loads of other benefits
35 days sick
What we get with it company:
Annual bonus if we are lucky.
20 days leave increases to 25, 1 a year.
It just seems so unfair that we don't get any of these benefits but have to work for the same company. I have been working at this place 3 years now.
What also annoys me is the attitude that the staff have with us. The secretaries and this other homosexual from accounts always ask the internal staff if they want a coffee but never ask us. I just think that is very rude, I asked them why they don't ask us if we want a coffee as we are just in the next office, they said because we work for X company. I don't realy see how that should make any difference.
I heard from this old guy at my previous job that there was a new regulation that forces employer to give contractors the benefits that normal staff get because employers were using this technically to avoid giving benefits to staff that were essentially perm staff.
At least they could offer us some of the benefits like the gym membership.![]()
I just think these out sourced contracts should stipulate that on site staff that are permanent and have been there for a say 2 years should have some of the benefits the internal staff get.
Same sex unions? AMIRIGHT??
I kid I kid
![]()
We are not directly employed contractors we are permanent staff of an IT company that has the contract to do the IT. Which the law firms benefit from because they always have cover and gain from more technical engineers that help if need be and they don't have to employ new staff and so on. But I think they could offer some benefits like gym membership and also offer to make us coffee, basically treat us better and not like a bunch outsiders.
The post man is not permanently based in the office next to them.