So if a copper turned up at your door out of the blue one day and told you they thought you'd been up to no good and they were taking your stuff, you'd be fine with it? Because personally I'd be ****ing furious.
Why would they need a warrant to seize the stuff if they believe it is evidence?
What the? That is not what I said is it?
Of course I would be furious, but it is NOT theft. It is not dishonest, the police need a warrant to get your stuff, and if you are innocent you get it back.
Would it be any different if he gave up a lot voluntarily? for instance, he said to me he let them into his house, The police refused to give a reason why initially. Took him into the kitchen away from his mother and then explained the situation.
Its quite possible he gave up his stuff voluntarily? Would that get around them needing a warrant, etc. (I've never actually asked him about this)
Are they allowed to seize anything they say they believe is evidence?
"Excuse me sir, that nice Ferrari you have on your drive, I think that may be evidence, along with that lovely Rolex you're wearing. That 50" TV is nice too, er... did I say nice? I meant suspicious, we're going to have to take it all I'm afraid!"
Off course they can, if they believe it's evidence in a criminal case.
Are they allowed to seize anything they say they believe is evidence?
"Excuse me sir, that nice Ferrari you have on your drive, I think that may be evidence, along with that lovely Rolex you're wearing. That 50" TV is nice too, er... did I say nice? I meant suspicious, we're going to have to take it all I'm afraid!"
In exactly the same condition as they took it?
And under what grounds could they believe a PS3 or 360 (neither of which have the ability to take pictures without external hardware) are evidence in this case?
They need a warrant. They have to be able to give enough evidence to prove the seizure could lead to more evidence on the case. They don't just show up willy nilly and take stuff.
Usually the tests are non destructive, but obviously not always. But this is what compensation is for.
The alternative is for the police not to have the tools they need to gather evidence. That wouldn't work to well would it?
And under what grounds could they believe a PS3 or 360 (neither of which have the ability to take pictures without external hardware) are evidence in this case?
I can understand the phone, but I'd be wanting the SIM card out.
I'd also be cloning hard disks/memory sticks and taking detailed photos of the condition.
Are they allowed to seize anything they say they believe is evidence?
"Excuse me sir, that nice Ferrari you have on your drive, I think that may be evidence, along with that lovely Rolex you're wearing. That 50" TV is nice too, er... did I say nice? I meant suspicious, we're going to have to take it all I'm afraid!"
In exactly the same condition as they took it?
They need a warrant. They have to be able to give enough evidence to prove the seizure could lead to more evidence on the case. They don't just show up willy nilly and take stuff.
360 and PS3 can access Facebook.
Good point. So can his computer at work. I'm assuming they've seized that too?
That would require a warrant.
Advice to OP.
Stay well clear of any ongoing investigation, do not get involved, let it run it's course and if your friend is innocent, he will be release without charge.
Let his solicitor deal with it and DON'T get involved other than being supportive of your friend at what is obviously a difficult time for him.
Why is there a difference?
Read my link a couple of posts up. Section 32 of PACE won't extend to work premises.
That's cool then. I work from home![]()