Atheism is not absence of belief. It is belief that there is no God. It is a faith based position as much as believing in God is.
Those babies you mention will be closer to agnostic than atheist.
So, let me get this straight. You're claiming that Charles Darwin, who died in 1882, was a supporter of the Nazi party? A political party that didn't get going until around 1919-1920. How does that work then?
That's not true - it is the rejection of the belief in deities (i.e. in the broad sense, atheist agnostic).Atheism is not absence of belief. It is belief that there is no God. It is a faith based position as much as believing in God is.
Your faith should be underpined by reason. Blind faith is no faith. You have reasons why you believe as you do I would assume and within those reasons should lie your proof. Whether others accept your reasoning or not doesnt mean a whole lot unless they claim you are wrong, then they should show their reasoning why you are wrong. It is effectively pitting one body of evidence against another, one set of proofs against another opposing set of proofs.
That's not true - it is the rejection of the belief in deities (i.e. in the broad sense, atheist agnostic).
I believe you're coming at it from a narrow definition of the word atheism, which would be wrong, because the definition has well evolved over the last couple of decades.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism
I hope all you atheists realise you support the devil, and will burn in the lake of fire for eternity for your blasphemy.
No it doesnt. Just blind ignorance!![]()
No, blind ignorance and/or brainwashing is what you get in any mass religion. Atheism makes more sense than any of the mass religions, but that doesn't stop it requiring faith.
Now stop trolling, no-one can make the statements you have and mean them and still remember to breathe and be able to type. You'd be too stupid.
You might think it does, but it doesn't.That rejection requires faith.
How can I lose a debate that I've not been part of?Trolling? lol, you lose a debate and you throw your dummy out of the pram!!![]()
How can I lose a debate that I've not been part of?
Oh, so you just pop in to have a dig then?
Nope, just to tell you to sto ptrolling and put my point across.
Not trolling though. Why would it be trolling? I am putting my point across but you dont accept that! Maybe you are trolling?
Not all propositions are created equally: faith is a belief in something for which insufficient evidence exists.
Atheism is not absence of belief. It is belief that there is no God. It is a faith based position as much as believing in God is.
Definition of atheism
noun
[mass noun]
disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.
Those babies you mention will be closer to agnostic than atheist.
What you're doing there is trying to force atheism into the distorted mould and framework of faith and belief in god. I suggest reading around your philosophy before playing with that fire: http://philosophersplayground.blogspot.co.uk/2007/01/faitheism-does-atheism-require-faith.htmlThere is insufficient evidence that god doesn't exist (mostly because it's virtually impossible to prove a negative).
Therefore, atheism is the faith that god unequivocally does not exist, regardless of the lack of evidence to prove it.
There is insufficient evidence that god doesn't exist (mostly because it's virtually impossible to prove a negative).
Therefore, atheism is the faith that god unequivocally does not exist, regardless of the lack of evidence to prove it.