So you don't believe in the big bang?
Can you answer my point about infinity please?
So you don't believe in the big bang?
Ah yes, that was the one I was thinking of. I always forget the name, I think Francis Drake![]()
But, as I said earlier, most of Physics relies on conjecture.
Michael Critchton said:The problem, of course, is that none of the terms can be known, and most cannot even be estimated. The only way to work the equation is to fill in with guesses. [...] As a result, the Drake equation can have any value from "billions and billions" to zero. An expression that can mean anything means nothing. Speaking precisely, the Drake equation is literally meaningless...
most of Physics relies on conjecture.
Everywhere physicists look they find fine-tuning. The odds that these laws would land on the right parameter at the same time is practically impossible.
MOST of physics in based on conjecture? Really?
Are you making the mistake of thinking because something is not physically visible (ergo pretty much all of what physics studies) then the conclusions of studying it are nothing but best guesses?
The fact physics theories (and again the word theory in scientific terms pretty much means 'accepted fact') exists kinda disproves that statement.
I sometimes wonder if people even read the links they provide as evidence.
Everywhere physicists look they find fine-tuning. The odds that these laws would land on the right parameter at the same time is practically impossible.
The problem with this is that we have working models that contradict accepted fact.
It's a good thing I wasn't using the Drake equation as evidence![]()
I am well aware of what the Drake Equation is, and how it works. Maybe my post earlier was a little misworded, I should have put "there is massive statistical evidence that there is a high probability of aliens existing" as I seem to have been misunderstood.
And the great thing about science is when that happens (I'd be interested to see your examples) then the theory is updated.
Not something that happens with the Bible or Qu'ran.
It's a good thing I wasn't using the Drake equation as evidence![]()
I am well aware of what the Drake Equation is, and how it works. Maybe my post earlier was a little misworded, I should have put "there is massive statistical evidence that there is a high probability of aliens existing" as I seem to have been misunderstood.
And the great thing about science is when that happens (I'd be interested to see your examples) then the theory is updated.
Not something that happens with the Bible or Qu'ran.
So you hold a belief with no evidence which surely is blind faith as I originally stated.
I'm not presenting a case for the opposition.