So the moon landing was faked!

Deific said:
Without first checking for yourself or asking for reference you immediate dismiss experts on the opposing side as non-experts or frauds. Pathetic.
Click to expand...

I have checked myself, we've had a million of these threads and I've read up on the subject extensively.

S until you post something, then the above applies.

Pathetic? Not in the slightest. It's just means I'm alsmot guaranteed to know every aspect you will see to show a hoax and not one of them is a valid theory, let alone provable.
 
The one bit i dont understand is how no dust was displaced by the "thrusters" when it was landing

oh, and if they were capable of getting to the moon and flying sr71s then fiddling with camera stuff would have been no problem
 
Matt82 said:
The one bit i dont understand is how no dust was displaced by the "thrusters" when it was landing

oh, and if they were capable of getting to the moon and flying sr71s then fiddling with camera stuff would have been no problem
Click to expand...

Because the amount of thrust you need is quite small and there is no atmosphere on the moon so the thrust only impacts on its direct contact. No air to blow around to displace more dust.
 
Matt82 said:
The one bit i dont understand is how no dust was displaced by the "thrusters" when it was landing
Click to expand...

Of course dust was displaced. Hell, you can hear them say on Apollo 11 as it gets close to the surface that they were kicking up dust for example. But in 1/6th mavity, they didn't need to have the descent engine running at full bore so were unlikely to blow a ruddy great crater beneath their landing site.

As for taking off again - the ascent stage used the descent stage as a launching platform, so the rocket exhaust wouldn't directly contact the ground then.
 
Matt82 said:
The one bit i dont understand is how no dust was displaced by the "thrusters" when it was landing
Click to expand...

Unlike the movies, they are not big rockets, they are also throttled back and then shut down, unlike the movies they don't hover and kick up a shed load of dust.
Also without an atmosphere there's little to no movement of dust, so it falls straight back down following gravities path, rather than on earth where you get dust clouds.
 
JRS said:
Of course dust was displaced. Hell, you can hear them say on Apollo 11 as it gets close to the surface that they were kicking up dust for example. But in 1/6th mavity, they didn't need to have the descent engine running at full bore so were unlikely to blow a ruddy great crater beneath their landing site.
Click to expand...

exactly, in the landing sequence i think someone says they have lost sight of the surface due to the dust etc

im going to find some pics of the landing to see if any crater is clear
 
gillywibble said:
LOL, stalling? You want me to produce detailed information, with source references, in literally an hour. It's going to take at least a week if not longer.

I will keep my word though, you can be assured of that.
Click to expand...

You could at least post a summary of which points you are intending to address so we can knock most of them on head before you waste a week of your time on it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom