Poundland Girl Wins Forced Labour Ruling

Like she exploits the benefits system. If she really wanted a job she would work through it and move on. Now she's sat back at home doing nothing, even less employable than she was while she was working.

MW

Did you even read the article? She was doing voluntary work before being "forced" into Workfare!

I do a lot of voluntary work (Scouting, Charity work though my Freemasonry etc) and it's often harder than my "day job"!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't believe some people actually think this ruling is a good thing, so people sitting on their backside claiming benefits is okay but making them work and thus gain experience that will help them get a job is a bad thing :confused:
 
Exactly - place her with a tech firm or management firm and I'll bet she'd work her socks off. What credible experience relating to her status and eductation could she possibly gain from working at Poundland!

That a job you have before or during Uni - not after!

I think she was actually doing voluntary work prior to "Pound land" so gave up doing something useful so the system could put a tick in a box. Shocking really, what a waste
 
I can't believe some people actually think this ruling is a good thing, so people sitting on their backside claiming benefits is okay but making them work and thus gain experience that will help them get a job is a bad thing :confused:

I can't believe people think being made to work for slave wages in Poundland is a good thing... How would that experience be beneficial?
 
The point often missed is that jsa is rarely claimed in isolation. I wonder how many people would sit on benefits with no job if the system guaranteed you would always be better off with paid employment?
 
I can't believe some people actually think this ruling is a good thing, so people sitting on their backside claiming benefits is okay but making them work and thus gain experience that will help them get a job is a bad thing :confused:

I've no issue with people doing 11.5hr of work in return for thier JSA.

30+hrs a week is exploitation though.
 
I can't believe people think being made to work for slave wages in Poundland is a good thing... What sort of benefit is that experience meant to give?

Its not slave wages though, its almost the same as an apprentice earns, the idea is your paid less because your getting skills that help you.
 
All i have seen about this scheme seems to involve relatively low rent companies, low skilled jobs, low wages, rightly or wrongly leads very well into creating a perception of forced labour with no real benefits.

If they could just sign up some decent companies, provide decent training and prospect of a decent position at the end would do a lot to improve public perception of the scheme.

Not saying i agree with the scheme just that i see the above as a PR problem
 
I can't believe some people actually think this ruling is a good thing, so people sitting on their backside claiming benefits is okay but making them work and thus gain experience that will help them get a job is a bad thing :confused:

So would you be happy earning about £2 an hour working in Poundland after making the effort of getting a degree from a good university?
 
Exactly - place her with a tech firm or management firm and I'll bet she'd work her socks off. What credible experience relating to her status and eductation could she possibly gain from working at Poundland!

That a job you have before or during Uni - not after!

See, I just dont understand that attitude. I worked in McDonalds after graduating while I looked for a proper job. it never occurred to me to expect other people to pay for me.
 
The point often missed is that jsa is rarely claimed in isolation. I wonder how many people would sit on benefits with no job if the system guaranteed you would always be better off with paid employment?

The system does garuntee that you'll always be better off (monetarily at least) if you have a job.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What skills?

Not sure if serious...

Lets see, well she would have to communicate with customers, work as part of a team, etc, etc. even if it was just stacking shelves the is more to stock systems than just picking things up from a box that appears by magic and putting it on a shelf...
 
See, I just dont understand that attitude. I worked in McDonalds after graduating while I looked for a proper job. it never occurred to me to expect other people to pay for me.

What if you couldn't get employed by McDonalds or anywhere else? If your only option was to claim JSA so that you could live, would you think it's acceptable that you're forced to work but paid peanuts? Not everyone on JSA is on it by choice.
 
So would you be happy earning about £2 an hour working in Poundland after making the effort of getting a degree from a good university?

If the alternative was getting the same amount of money to sit at home watching daytime TV while my job prospects spin in neutral, then yes actually.
 
Did you even read the article? She was doing voluntary work before being "forced" into Workfare!

I do a lot of voluntary work (Scouting, Charity work though my Freemasonry etc) and it's often harder than my "day job"!

Unfortunately voluntary work doesn't pay the bills. She has a Geology degree so I doubt there's many jobs and voluntary work in the museum is probably her only way in. It might not be beneficial to her career prospects but the scheme is designed to get people off benefits.

MW
 
Not sure if serious...

Lets see, well she would have to communicate with customers, work as part of a team, etc, etc. even if it was just stacking shelves the is more to stock systems than just picking things up from a box that appears by magic and putting it on a shelf...

You really think working in a supermarket is comparable to an apprenticeship?

Not sure if serious.
 
Back
Top Bottom