• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Geforce Titan rumours.

http://www.nvidia.com/titan-graphics-card


NVIDIA® TXAA™ technology
NVIDIA GPU Boost 2.0
NVIDIA PhysX® technology
NVIDIA FXAA™ technology
NVIDIA Adaptive Vertical Sync
NVIDIA Surround™
Support for four concurrent displays including:
Two dual-link DVI
HDMI1
DisplayPort 1.2
Microsoft DirectX 11.1 API (feature level 11_0)
NVIDIA Project SHIELD™-Ready
NVIDIA 3D Vision®-Ready2
NVIDIA SLI®-Ready
NVIDIA CUDA® technology
PCI Express 3.0 support
OpenGL 4.3 support
OpenCL™ support
 
ALXAndy said:
Knowing 3D as well as I do and knowing that it's bad enough on one monitor I would highly doubt Titan will be able to run 5760x1080 in 3d or whatever the exact resolution is.

I ran one 3D monitor which was passive (so 1920x720 or something odd) and even with two 480s in SLI I could not run Crysis smoothly.

I would strongly doubt that Titan would run Crysis 3 in 3D across three screens. Not if it is as the performance benchmarks shown yesterday portray.

So whatever you seem to think Titan can do you're still going to end up lowering settings especially in 3D.
Click to expand...

Weird, because with settings turned down, I could run 3D with SLI 680's and fairly well. Some games obviously tougher than others. Even with max settings, it was close to coping well.

SEPCHARTS.jpg


As you can see, I have done some extensive 3 screen gaming and not just taking a wild guess at it and claiming "You will be lowering settings in 3D"

Maybe you don't know 3D as well as you thought?
 
ACEOWNER said:
Prove you made that graph. If you did then it's shocking and it in no way proves SLI TITAN's won't be able to cope. So if you would like to discuss things as an adult start by not making things up of the top of your head.
Click to expand...

I made loads of them when I did a review for AMD 3D.

The important part being the actual FPS and not how good the graphs looked :rolleyes:

So I'm sorry they don't have a titanium cooler on them with a name to match but what was more important was the 3D performance and the numbers.

mafia2.jpg


So there's another one.

justcause2.jpg


And another one.

Because when I can be of assistance and provide something helpful I will.

If one Titan card can manage 50 FPS (and I will assume that's the minimum FPS as that's what counts) without 3D @ 1080p then I can absolutely assure you that on three screens on two Titans the settings will need to be reduced.

And this is going by what the same people who are buying Titan have been screaming at me for weeks - IE - I can see the difference between 60 and 120FPS and I can prove it !!!!

So how are they going to manage when they are hitting the 30s? or even the 20s or worse?
 
ALXAndy said:
I made loads of them when I did a review for AMD 3D.

The important part being the actual FPS and not how good the graphs looked :rolleyes:

So I'm sorry they don't have a titanium cooler on them with a name to match but what was more important was the 3D performance and the numbers.

mafia2.jpg


So there's another one.

justcause2.jpg


And another one.

Because when I can be of assistance and provide something helpful I will.

If one Titan card can manage 50 FPS (and I will assume that's the minimum FPS as that's what counts) without 3D @ 1080p then I can absolutely assure you that on three screens on two Titans the settings will need to be reduced.

And this is going by what the same people who are buying Titan have been screaming at me for weeks - IE - I can see the difference between 60 and 120FPS and I can prove it !!!!

So how are they going to manage when they are hitting the 30s? or even the 20s or worse?
Click to expand...

Still doesn't prove that TITAN won't be able to cope. Wait till people have actually tested it before spouting crap please.
 
gregster said:
Weird, because with settings turned down, I could run 3D with SLI 680's and fairly well. Some games obviously tougher than others. Even with max settings, it was close to coping well.



As you can see, I have done some extensive 3 screen gaming and not just taking a wild guess at it and claiming "You will be lowering settings in 3D"

Maybe you don't know 3D as well as you thought?
Click to expand...

under 60fps isnt acceptable minfps.
I regard fps gaming for that, rts is another case.
 
I personally can't stand 3d AMD or Nvidia, good for 10 min but after that's it's pretty meh. I'm the same with the cinema though, the tech is so overhyped. Bring me virtual reality and a I'll be impressed!
 
Frenzy said:
I personally can't stand 3d AMD or Nvidia, good for 10 min but after that's it's pretty meh. I'm the same with the cinema though, the tech is so overhyped. Bring me virtual reality and a I'll be impressed!
Click to expand...

As much as I love 3D (and I do) it's another stupid technology that will never become mainstream because it relies on something else (glasses) and some one else (game makers and so on).

And once again because of that it's a catch 22. Game developers don't want to spend the time and money making it better because hardly any one uses it. And because hardly any one uses it they won't spend the time and money.....


It's the same with every other half idea that these companies come out with. And yes I confess all of that after falling in love with 3D and gaming in 3D for almost a year. At least I can see it for what it is. A bit silly.
 
ALXAndy said:
I made loads of them when I did a review for AMD 3D.

The important part being the actual FPS and not how good the graphs looked :rolleyes:

So I'm sorry they don't have a titanium cooler on them with a name to match but what was more important was the 3D performance and the numbers.

mafia2.jpg


So there's another one.

justcause2.jpg


And another one.

Because when I can be of assistance and provide something helpful I will.

If one Titan card can manage 50 FPS (and I will assume that's the minimum FPS as that's what counts) without 3D @ 1080p then I can absolutely assure you that on three screens on two Titans the settings will need to be reduced.

And this is going by what the same people who are buying Titan have been screaming at me for weeks - IE - I can see the difference between 60 and 120FPS and I can prove it !!!!

So how are they going to manage when they are hitting the 30s? or even the 20s or worse?
Click to expand...

How is this relevant to what Titans can do?

I have shown you my testing, which gives a better indication of how Titans will cope with 3D, max detail, in some of the slightly newer games.

That graph doesn't show anything.. What CPU? What memory? what GPU? What game details.

Very poor effort of showing how Titan can't cope in 3D.

flopper said:
under 60fps isnt acceptable minfps.
I regard fps gaming for that, rts is another case.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
 
guy can't read, the implementation of 3D in crysis 2 and 3 is different to almost every other game, there is roughly a 5% performance decrease by enabling 3D but it is nowhere near as impressive as the true 3D vision. so if you can run crysis 2 or 3 in 2d surround you will able to run it in 3D surround also

Frenzy said:
I personally can't stand 3d AMD or Nvidia, good for 10 min but after that's it's pretty meh. I'm the same with the cinema though, the tech is so overhyped. Bring me virtual reality and a I'll be impressed!
Click to expand...

1.5 months, oculus rift
 
Yeah I've been looking at the oculus rift. This has me really excited, probably my most anticipated gadget ever. I love the fact that they have carmack and gabe onboard. It means it will get REAL support.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom