• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Geekbench

Mine seems a bit slow compared to other mobile chips here... (eg NickK's 2.4GHz Santa Rosa)
C2D T8100 @ 2.1GHz 3MB L2, 3GB DDR2-667, Santa Rosa = 2326 points.
 
12158

Please keep images to below 1280px or post in
tags - Rilot
32 bit test one (possibly could get more if did the 64 bit test?)

My cpu's didnt even go above 50-60% on the cores :/
 
Last edited:
Has the benchmark changed since it first came out in 2007? As even budget CPU seem to be delivering ten times the performance or mid range CPU in 2007 which seems a lot more than i would expect.
 
Geffen said:
Has the benchmark changed since it first came out in 2007? As even budget CPU seem to be delivering ten times the performance or mid range CPU in 2007 which seems a lot more than i would expect.
Click to expand...

It hasn't from what I see but it's not ranking cpu flops - it's a compound of cpu and memory which is why a G530 scores high despite being slightly slower than an overclocked e5200.

In a way this compound measure is more accurate representation of real life usage as the G530 as we all know is a lot more snappier than an e5200 system.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom