What would it take for you to believe in ghosts?
- Thread starter robfosters
- Start date
......and because some people won't get the reference....
i have no idea, like i said all based on theory of what i have read however i carried out EVP's at 6 - 10pm which still get the best results.
Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Feb 2004
- Posts
- 8,222
- Location
- North East
Why are there no dinosaur ghosts?
Well thats why i have bought a 3k thermal imager, this can basically see them in full form if they apear very quickly and disapear, just as long as i am recording to video out i will have it saved.
I will be trying out tonight for the first time at night,just got used to the settings and stuff
Heres a picture of it if you dont believe i have one
edit another pic so you can see what it properly looks like
heres a video of a thermal imager catching a spirit/ghost from a ghost hunting team in usa using a flir type imager,i think thats the real deal and the best evidence ive seen which had changed my mind and want to explore this subject
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRIlOsJ2Bcg
this is a picture of the ghost or what ever it is just apearing out of no where , look it has fists like it does a punch or something to apear, its odd
you can see in this picture it has half of legs, the red outline around it is just the background blending in , this is pure white
you know its not a person because its white , if it was human you would see red for blood..
I will be trying out tonight for the first time at night,just got used to the settings and stuff
Heres a picture of it if you dont believe i have one
edit another pic so you can see what it properly looks like
heres a video of a thermal imager catching a spirit/ghost from a ghost hunting team in usa using a flir type imager,i think thats the real deal and the best evidence ive seen which had changed my mind and want to explore this subject
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRIlOsJ2Bcg
this is a picture of the ghost or what ever it is just apearing out of no where , look it has fists like it does a punch or something to apear, its odd
you can see in this picture it has half of legs, the red outline around it is just the background blending in , this is pure white
you know its not a person because its white , if it was human you would see red for blood..
Last edited:
Apparently they can be seen in ultravoilet light, which is why we "CANNOT" see them in front of us, in most instances they are out of the corner of our eye which can receive small amount of ultravoilet rays which can be adapted.
But you are not saying it's unexplained, you are saying it's Auras.
Do you not understand how illogical it is to state "I don't know what X is, therefore it must be Y".
It's not a belief.
It makes more logical sense that you either imagined it, hallucinated, have an over-active imagination or are mentally ill.
Next you will be telling me you believe in Reiki.
Try taking a picture of yourself with your camera
il do that tonght , i need to sleep now before work comes around again
after the last night of work for the week i have all weekend now to play around with this
Last edited:
plain wrong.
lol - you still don't understand how the camera you paid a fortune even works.
I think he was, like me, a bit concerned about the definitive way you stated that they did not exist, without getting into a debate on who is has the burden of proof, if there is definitive proof that they don't, I would like to read about it, if not then you simply believe that they don't exist.
I don't particularly believe in auras either, but then I don't know much about it either.
Last edited:
In theory ghost are seen in the IR/UV spectrum which is why you can't normally see them, camera's can pick this up due to the sensitivity of equipment.
I know what you mean (technically yes you are correct), but it's not a great argument when it can be used with just as much force when talking about Santa Claus.
As you can't prove he doesn't exist technically either, by that definition everything could exist but then the meaning of the word is so diluted it's lost any value.
Would it be excessive to say Gnomes don't exist?.
Anyway I don't want to get drawn into a debate about the philosophical definitions of existence & I stand by the below advice for the person in question.
There is no such thing as an aura - stop reading stupid spiritual books like "The Secret" & seek professional help for the depression/life problems which have led you into believing this utterly feeble destructive scam.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_burden_of_evidence
Last edited:
what do you mean by that?
Soldato
- Joined
- 31 May 2009
- Posts
- 21,468
Go,on take some pictures of yourself, clothed and less clothed.
With the thermal camera.
Then tell us why ghosts appear white, the hottest part of the thermal spectrum.
Either you are missingmthe conceptmof thermal cameras, you are edcuationally subnormal, or you are trolling.
You pick a b or c, and let us know which.
I have read a great deal on the subject and have come to the conclusion that ghosts do indeed exist, but only as things that can already be or will be explained by scientific means. On an intimate level, I haven't experienced anything that I can say definitely touches upon what some might called paranormality.
Most modern 'hauntings' can be rationalised with an investigation into psychological and environmental factors that surround them. Some, though, are genuinely inexplicable. Most older hauntings are, generally, embellished and distorted to a degree that smudges any veracity once possessed.
That video falls a very, very long way short of any kind of proof anything I'm afraid.
I thought 'biofields' were proven via Kirlianography. I guess some people would call them auras. I'm not knowledgeable on that subject.
Most modern 'hauntings' can be rationalised with an investigation into psychological and environmental factors that surround them. Some, though, are genuinely inexplicable. Most older hauntings are, generally, embellished and distorted to a degree that smudges any veracity once possessed.
That video falls a very, very long way short of any kind of proof anything I'm afraid.
I thought 'biofields' were proven via Kirlianography. I guess some people would call them auras. I'm not knowledgeable on that subject.
I would have to experience it in person, be given time to fully inspect the surroundings and the apparition, I would also need the event to be witnessed in person by a number of people both of my choosing and not, as well as people still viewing the event live but outside of the environment I was viewing it in.
I would also need detailed and live medical statistics of all those involved.
I would still be sceptical by the end of it, but would be some way convinced that the event a) wasn't trickery of the senses and b) wasn't caused by a personal madness (either induced or natural).
There are too many entirely believable reasons that even the most real experience was in some way faked for me to take anything at face value, only a fool would do so to be frank.
I would also need detailed and live medical statistics of all those involved.
I would still be sceptical by the end of it, but would be some way convinced that the event a) wasn't trickery of the senses and b) wasn't caused by a personal madness (either induced or natural).
There are too many entirely believable reasons that even the most real experience was in some way faked for me to take anything at face value, only a fool would do so to be frank.
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2009
- Posts
- 9,952
Yeah sure. Give a couple billion years.