Silly bint gets free boobs on the NHS

Jono8 · 30 Mar 2013 at 14:24

Dimple said:
Please don't say you've just compared male baldness to a female with no breasts?
However if it was a male under 16 suffering with baldness then they would also get my tax money.

So did she not have breasts ( i.e. no working breasts, unable to produce milk for a child e.t.c) or was it that they just werent very visible or very small?

If there was actually nothing medically and functionally wrong with her breasts, then yes, i am comparing it to male baldness as i don't see why one should be deemed more destructive to a person's mental health than the other? Both are purely cosmetic.

If she actually had no breasts or they didnt function like breasts then yes they are not comparable.

SexyGreyFox · 30 Mar 2013 at 14:29

Jono8 said:
So did she not have breasts ( i.e. no working breasts, unable to produce milk for a child e.t.c) or was it that they just werent very visible or very small?

Can't you read? She had 0% breast tissue but I'm afraid with not having her Medical Records at hand I don't know if she was capable of feeding a child (whatever that has got to do with it).

If you were born without balls or a 1" penis would you just accept it or would you use your right to seek help from the NHS?

Jono8 · 30 Mar 2013 at 14:36

Dimple said:
Can't you read? She had 0% breast tissue but I'm afraid with not having her Medical Records at hand I don't know if she was capable of feeding a child (whatever that has got to do with it).

If you were born without balls or a 1" penis would you just accept it or would you use your right to seek help from the NHS?

Is the before picture just showing padding then?

I am not saying i disagree with you. I am saying where do you draw the line? Who are you to say that a mans baldness would not distress him as much as this woman having no breasts or a man having a small penis?

SexyGreyFox · 30 Mar 2013 at 14:44

Jono8 said:
Is the before picture just showing padding then?

Yes, she said in her story that she couldn't go out without padding

Jono8 said:
I am not saying i disagree with you. I am saying where do you draw the line? Who are you to say that a mans baldness would not distress him as much as this woman having no breasts or a man having a small penis?

I'm not the one who decides who gets what.
I know from my own experience that baldness can distress a man because in the mid 90s my long flowing curly locks had to be cut down to a number 1 because of severe psoriasis of the scalp which I still have however within a month I got used to it. Even at 55 I'm capable of having a full head of hair but I can't because of the cornflakes that will fall off my head.

We have experts who make these decisions and since this girl was in consultation with her GP and Clinicians from the age of 14 they made the clinical decision.
If they had approved surgery for your 1" penis, lack of testicles or lack of hair then I would have to accept the Clinicians know what they are on about

UncleRuckus · 30 Mar 2013 at 14:49

Dimple said:
Yes, she said in her story that she couldn't go out without padding

If you look at the photo where she is outside in her tracksuit, you may notice that her left boobie is casting a shadow on her chest. If she had 0% breast tissue this could not happen...

Jono8 · 30 Mar 2013 at 14:49

Dimple said:
Yes, she said in her story that she couldn't go out without padding

I'm not the one who decides who gets what.
I know from my own experience that baldness can distress a man because in the mid 90s my long flowing curly locks had to be cut down to a number 1 because of severe psoriasis of the scalp which I still have however within a month I got used to it. Even at 55 I'm capable of having a full head of hair but I can't because of the cornflakes that will fall off my head.

We have experts who make these decisions and since this girl was in consultation with her GP and Clinicians from the age of 14 they made the clinical decision.
If they had approved surgery for your 1" penis, lack of testicles or lack of hair then I would have to accept the Clinicians know what they are on about

Fair enough. But it would then be difficult if every man who suffered from early baldness claimed to have been distressed (or even lied about their distress, like the girl in question did.....) and got a hair transplant of the NHS. The country might go broke!

This is the difficulty and the reason why people will be annoyed about it. I am sure countless people have genetic abnormalities that they do not like but they wouldnt dream of expecting the NHS to fund making it better.

I suppose we should give kudos to this woman, and those that have played the system and got themselves fixed up under the NHS, but what if everyone did it? Would you be happy to have 50% of your salary taken away so the NHS could afford to fix everyone up to have a "normal" body?

SexyGreyFox · 30 Mar 2013 at 14:55

UncleRuckus said:
If you look at the photo where she is outside in her tracksuit, you may notice that her left boobie is casting a shadow on her chest. If she had 0% breast tissue this could not happen...

Hmm, you don't think a padded bra can cast a shadow?

Jono8 said:
I suppose we should give kudos to this woman,

She was a little girl of 14 when she first went for help.

Jegethy · 30 Mar 2013 at 14:55

Derek W said:
her face reminds me of these

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=t...bHADMeDOPyfgMAB&ved=0CDsQsAQ&biw=1680&bih=898

UncleRuckus · 30 Mar 2013 at 15:00

Dimple said:
Hmm, you don't think a padded bra can cast a shadow?

Dimple, please look at the photo, study how the light is cast.

atpbx · 30 Mar 2013 at 15:02

Having just seen the "after" photos on the sun website, my wife has just said this lasses new baps look like a child has drawn them on.

And that scar tissue, were they fitted by a kwick fit fitter instead of a surgeon?

theleg · 30 Mar 2013 at 15:04

Dimple said:
She was a little girl of 14 when she first went for help.

Well

she was 14 when she first enquired about breast enlargement. it doesnt say anything about her having gone to the NHS over this distress issue at 14. Simply breast enlargement surgery. We have no way of knowing her reasons for doing so.

SexyGreyFox · 30 Mar 2013 at 15:14

Balddog said:
Well

she was 14 when she first enquired about breast enlargement. it doesnt say anything about her having gone to the NHS over this distress issue at 14. Simply breast enlargement surgery. We have no way of knowing her reasons for doing so.

What?
You don't know why a flat chested girl of 14 would go to her GP to enquire about it?

theleg · 30 Mar 2013 at 15:19

Dimple said:
What?
You don't know why a flat chested girl of 14 would go to her GP to enquire about it?

Nope, not one that has had dreams of being a glamour model. She has stated she wasnt depressed or bullied at school. We dont know when her emotional distress started. We do not know if she went to her GP about breast enlargement or a private doctor. We dont really know anything. Did she go because of the emotional distress or did she go because she wanted to be katie price? we dont know the facts in this case.

i cant imagine many 14 year old girls with flat chests go to their doctors. for the simple fact that they are still going through the growth process and everyone knows that. flat chest at 14 is not unusual.

bitslice · 30 Mar 2013 at 15:21

UncleRuckus said:
If you look at the photo where she is outside in her tracksuit, you may notice that her left boobie is casting a shadow on her chest. If she had 0% breast tissue this could not happen...

Doctors caught lying by forum poster! :eek:

If there is a bump then it is just breast fat, not the mammary tissue that is supposed to go underneath.

theleg · 30 Mar 2013 at 15:23

bitslice said:
Doctors caught lying by forum poster!

If there is a bump then it is just breast fat, not the mammary tissue that is supposed to go underneath.

Nobody said anything about the doctors.

Jason2 · 30 Mar 2013 at 15:25

It's her own stupid fault for selling her story to the newspaper. It's almost like she's rubbing it in. They are not the actions of someone who was suffering "emotional distress".

What gets me is, when I went for a cosmetic concern (teeth), I was rejected and had to pay myself. Seems one rule for some, and then another for others.

bitslice · 30 Mar 2013 at 15:32

Balddog said:
Nobody said anything about the doctors.

Where do you think the 0% tissue comment originated?

Jason2 said:
It's her own stupid fault for selling her story to the newspaper. It's almost like she's rubbing it in. They are not the actions of someone who was suffering "emotional distress".

What gets me is, when I went for a cosmetic concern (teeth), I was rejected and had to pay myself. Seems one rule for some, and then another for others.

Cancer victims have their story in the tabloids too, besides, the story is post-op and she wants to talk about it (AK, promote her boobs)

You think your teeth are as important as a girls boobs?

~>Dg<~ · 30 Mar 2013 at 15:42

well she hasnt done bad look at who signed her up to promote there products

UncleRuckus · 30 Mar 2013 at 15:42

bitslice said:
Doctors caught lying by forum poster!

If there is a bump then it is just breast fat, not the mammary tissue that is supposed to go underneath.

As a mammary gland, the breast is an inhomogeneous anatomic structure composed of layers of different types of tissue, among which predominate two types, adipose tissue and glandular tissue, which effects the lactation functions of the breasts.

The fat is part of a breast.

theleg · 30 Mar 2013 at 15:43

bitslice said:
Where do you think the 0% tissue comment originated?
Cancer victims have their story in the tabloids too, besides, the story is post-op and she wants to talk about it (AK, promote her boobs)

You think your teeth are as important as a girls boobs?

From her mouth alone at this point.