When you use OS X as your regular OS then go back to Windows it really is a wake up call as to what a pain the updates really are.
But you didn't answer the question. You were moaning about the frequency of Windows Updates, not your obvious dislike for Microsoft.
As others have mentioned, Microsoft's patch schedule is no worse than OS X.
What differences are you specifically referencing, please elaborate?
I use Windows 7 on my desktop, Windows 8 on my laptop and OSX at work.
The updates experience is pretty much exactly the same on them all in that I get prompted once a month, they download, install and you reboot.
It all happens in the background and unless you are using a seriously poverty spec machine you just carry on doing what you intended to do.
I have Microsoft stock so want it to do well, so what on earth are you talking about? However, I find their focus depressing. On the flip side I want people like yourself to keep buying into the dream, I just don't want to do so myself.
I used Windows 8 for the first time in around a month last week and gave up after about 10 mins of updates reboots, and Windows is configuring updates messages. How can I carry on working on the machine whilst all that is going on, I either have a blank screen or a purple one.
Faustus said:Literally ever time I boot into Parallels for Windows 8 most of the productive time is wasted waiting for Windows to configure updates.
you're doing something wrong.
I've looked at my update history. 85 updates installed over a 150 day period. Yes that's one every two days BUT the updates were installed on 14 occasions so that's actually less than once a week. In fact it's twice every 3 weeks, just about.
You must use it once a fortnight then?![]()
and that's perfectly fine. I use windows 7 at work, windows 8 at home. No issues swapping and changing between them. In fact when I'm working from home I remote in, so I'm often alt+tabbing between windows 7 and 8. No issues at all.
I've absolutely no problem with people not getting on with windows 8,but I don't think I'll ever understand how anybody can have such polar opinion on 7 and 8. I know it's been said a million times but take the metro stuff away and the desktop environments are pretty much the same, and that's where we spend most of our time so I just don't get it. Not interested in the metro stuff personally, so i don't use it![]()
I think even with Classic Shell you never fully get rid of that dreadful Modern UI. If I accidentally move the mouse into the right hand side that awful awful "charms" menu rears its ugly head. Whenever it happens it's like a red rag to a bull. Searching apps is awful to. Get rid of any signs of the modern UI, apps charms etc and I could get on with W8 no issue.
Do you mean Thunderbird the mail client?
Doesn't matter, there is no noticeable difference apart from the horrid Metro interface, if it annoys you can always install 'StartIsBack'. It brings back the classic start menu from previous versions of Windows.
Personally I'd rather keep the metro UI even on a non-touch screen, keeps the format the same over many devices and the metro search is extremely good and frighteningly fast.
The vast majority of users are on Windows XP or Windows 7 and won't be upset in the slightest by Windows 8. This idea that the existing user base is in outrage just isn't true.